^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

HITEN JAYENDRAKUMAR MANDALIYA vs. STATE OF GUJARAT & OTHER
(Gujarat High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

A.G.URAIZEE

Pet. Counsel

Chetan Pandya

Res. Counsel

Hardik Soni

Petitioner / Applicant	HITEN JAYENDRAKUMAR MANDALIYA
Respondent	STATE OF GUJARAT & OTHER
Court	Gujarat High Court
State	Gujrat
Date	Dec 15, 2020
Order No.	R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 17269 of 2020
Citation	2020(12) TAXREPLY 3639
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

AA |

ORDER
1. RULE. Mr. Soni, learned Additional Public Prosecutor waives service of notice of Rule on behalf of the respondent- State of Gujarat. 2. The present application is filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure by the applicant for regular bail in connection with File No. DCST/ENF/ACST-4/Hiten Mandaliya/ Arrest/2019-20/B-2 dated 6.12.2019 of the office of the Assistant Commissioner of State Tax, Gujarat State, Vadodara for the offences under Sections 132(1)(b)(c)(i) and 132(2) of the Gujarat Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. 3. Heard Mr. Chet;an Pandya, learned advocate for Mr. Maulik Vakhariya, learned advocate for the applicant and Mr. Hardik Soni, learned APP for the respondent-State. 4. Mr. Pandya, learned advocate for the applicant submits that the present application is filed after filing of the complaint by the respondent No.2. It is his further submission that the alleged input evasion is to the extent of ....