Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,903 Results

ECLERY FOODS LLP


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Telangana | Dec 3, 2020)

Sub:- C.T. Department Authority for clarification and Advance Rulings – Certain clarification sought by M/s. Eclery Foods LLP – Application withdrawn - Regarding. In the reference 1st cited, M/s. Eclery Foods LLP, has sought certain clarifications in Advance Ruling. As seen from the application filed by M/s. Eclery Foods LLP, Medchal, Hyderabad the dealer have paid required fee of ₹ 10,000/- towards IGST and CGST instead of SGST and CGST. In view of the above, vide r...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

LORVEN FLEX AND SACK INDIA PVT LTD,


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Telangana | Dec 3, 2020)

Sub:- C.T. Department Authority for clarification and Advance Rulings – Certain clarification sought by M/s. Lorven Flex and Sack India Pvt Ltd – Application withdrawn - Regarding. In the reference 1st cited, M/s. Lorven Flex and Sack India Pvt Ltd has sought certain clarification by filing an application for Advance Ruling. Through the reference 2nd cited, Superintendent (Central Tax), Medchal Range, was requested to go through the attachment and inform the above pendency of ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

R.S. DEVELOPMENT & CONSTRUCTIONS PVT LTD.


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Kerala | Dec 3, 2020)

1. The appeal stands filed under section 100(1) of the GST Act, 2017, by M/s R. S. Development and constructions India Pvt Ltd having a registered office at NMC, XIV/181A, Neyyattinkara, bearing GSTIN 32AAECR1869D1ZL (hereinafter also referred as the appellant). The appeal stands filed against the Advance ruling Order No: KER/64/2019 dated 12-10-2019 pronounced by the Kerala Authority for Advance ruling. Brief facts of the case: 2. Kerala State Electricity Board ha...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petitioner, an authorized agent, for sale and distribution of lotteries organized by State of Punjab has filed this writ petition impugning the definition of goods under Section 2(52) of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and consequential notifications to the extent it levies tax on lotteries. The petitioner seeks declaration that the levy of tax on lottery is discriminatory and violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 301 and 304 of the Constitution of India. 2. We need to notice c...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

BHARTI AIRTEL LIMITED vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.


(Delhi High Court | Dec 3, 2020)

The application has been listed before this Bench by the Registry in view of the urgency expressed therein. The same has been heard by way of video conferencing. Present application has been filed by the petitioner seeking to amend the writ petition in order to incorporate a prayer challenging the proviso to Section 16(4) of the Central Goods And Services Act, 2017(hereinafter referred to as the 'CGST Act, 2017') as well as Delhi Goods And Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter refer...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petitioner has approached this Court aggrieved by a detention notice served in connection with the transportation of goods at his instance. Ext.P8 is the detention notice in Form GST MOV -7 and a perusal of the said notice indicates that the respondents have found that the invoice that accompanied the transportation of the goods did not contain any date thereon, and moreover, while the shipping date was shown as 15.11.2020, the date shown in the e-way bill was 25.11.2020. It was also noti...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

VINESH JAIN vs. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS.


(Delhi High Court | Dec 3, 2020)

The petition has been listed before this Bench by the registry in view of the urgency expressed therein. The same has been heard by way of video conferencing. Present writ petition has been filed for directing the respondents to make the inventory of the goods and issue a copy of the GST MOV-04 to the respondent. Learned counsel for the petitioner further prays for intimation to the petitioner regarding the payment of any tax or penalty as per the GST Act, 2017, under Section 129, for...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. Heard Sri Praveen Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri C. B. Tripathi, learned special counsel for the Union of India. 2. This writ petition has been filed praying for the following relief:- (i) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent nos. 3 and 4 not to proceed with any inquiry against the petitioner and to talk any coercive steps against the petitioner, in pursuance of the impugned summoned. (ii) To issue any other ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. Heard Sri Suyash Agarwal, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri C.B. Tripathi, learned Special Counsel for respondent no.1. 2. This writ petition has been filed praying for following reliefs :" I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari quashing the order no.731 dated 15.2.2018 passed by Respondent no.1 u/s 129(3) of the UPGST Act (Annexure No. 6) II Issue a writ, order or direction in nature of certiorari quashing GST DRC07 dated 18.9.2020 (Annex...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

MOHAMMED YUNUS vs. UNION OF INDIA


(Rajasthan High Court | Dec 2, 2020)

1. Petitioner has filed this third bail application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. 2. F.I.R. No. DGGI/JZU/INV/GRH/GST/109/2019-20 was registered at Police Station Senior Intelligence Directorate, Jaipur, Zonal Unit, Jaipur for offence under Sections 132(1) of Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. 3. It is contended by counsels for the petitioner that sentence provided for the offence is five years. Petitioner has remained in custody for a period of one year. It is contended that in similar ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


25
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 Apr

☑ Half-Yearly | ITC-04

ITC-04 for the half year (Oct - Mar 2025) (For taxpayers > 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

☑ Annual | ITC-04

ITC-04 for complete FY 2024-25 (For taxpayers <= 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)