^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

SAFARULLA PADIKKAL vs. STATE TAX OFFICER AND OTHERS
(Kerala High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

AMIT RAWAL

Pet. Counsel

C.k.sreejith

Res. Counsel

Jasmin.m.m

Petitioner / Applicant	SAFARULLA PADIKKAL
Respondent	STATE TAX OFFICER AND OTHERS
Court	Kerala High Court
State	Kerala
Date	Dec 7, 2020
Order No.	WP(C). No.19436 of 2020(D)
Citation	2020(12) TAXREPLY 3591
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

AA |

ORDER
The petitioner, a tax payer under the CGST and SGST Act 2017 who has been issued a TIN Number, a registered works contractor under the KVAT Act prior to the introduction of GST in July 2017, through the instant writ petition has approached this Court for issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to accept the request for access to GST portal enabling the petitioner to upload return for the periods from the implementation of GST with a further direction to the respondents to accept revised return from 2017 to March 2018. It is submitted that from 31.3.2018, the petitioner has not been able to access the portal and upload the returns. Petitioner had requested the department to rectification of return but no action has been taken. The petitioner has filed the income tax return as evidenced from Exts.P4 and P5. 2. On the other hand, learned Government Pleader submitted that the request of the petitioner for composition was forwarded to the Joint Commissi....