1. On the previous date i.e., 12.05.2022, we had recorded as follows:
“1. The counsel for the petitioner informs us that the grievance of the petitioner has been partially addressed, as the principal amount towards refund has already been remitted.
1.1. Therefore, according to learned counsel for the petitioner, what remains is the payment of statutory interest.
1.2. This position is affirmed by the counsel for the respondents.
2. As a matter of fact, a copy of the order....
1. This writ petition is directed against the appellate order dated 28.06.2021, passed by respondent no.1.
1.1. Besides the challenge to the aforementioned order i.e., Order-inAppeal, challenge is also laid to the show-cause notice (SCN) dated 29.10.2019 and the order dated 25.11.2019 passed by the concerned authority, cancelling the petitioners’ registration.
2. What is not in dispute before us is that the Order-in-Appeal passed by respondent no.1 is founded on the ground that ....
(National Anti Profiteering Authority
| Jul 20, 2022)
ORDER
1. The Present Report dated 26.02.2021 had been received from the Applicant No. 2 i.e. the Director-General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after a detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017 (Rules). The brief facts of the present are that the Applicant No. 1 has alleged that the Respondent had not passed on the benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) to him by way of commensurate reduction in the price of the Unit No. 8-173 purchased b....
(National Anti Profiteering Authority
| Jul 20, 2022)
ORDER
1. A Report dated 30.08,2019 has been received from the Applicant No. 2 i.e. the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after a detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the case are that an application dated 26.02.2019 was filed before the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering, under Rule 128 of the CGST Rules, 2017 by the Applicant No. 1 which alleged that the Respondent had profiteered in respec....
1. Petitioner has sought the following prayers:-
(a) this Hon’ble Court be pleased to issue a Writ of Certiorari or a writ in the nature of Certiorari or any other writ, order or direction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India calling for the records pertaining to the Petitioner’s case and after going into the validity and legality thereof be pleased to quash and set aside (i) the Impugned Order dated 05.07.2022 passed by the Respondent No.2 (Exhibit “A”) ....
1. Petitioner is impugning 11 identical orders all dated 25th August, 2021, by which petitioner’s appeals were rejected. Petitioner is a company incorporated under the laws of Hongkong and is registered as a branch office in India engaged in the business of providing services in relation to mining, offshore exploration, drilling of crude petroleum and natural gas etc..
2. Petitioner, in the course of its business, had filed claims for refund of all unutilized input tax credit f....
ORDER
( Per the Hon’ble the Chief Justice Ujjal Bhuyan )
Heard Mr. M.V.J.K.Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. L.Venkateswar Rao, learned counsel for respondents No.2 to 4.
2. By filing this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioner seeks a declaration that para 3.2 of Circular No.135/05/2020-GST, dated 31.03.2020, of the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (briefly, ‘the Board’ hereinafter) is ultra vires Section 5....
This petition, under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short “Cr.P.C.”), is filed by the petitioner/A25 for grant of anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest in connection with Crime No.29 of 2021 of CID Police Station, Mangalagiri, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 166, 167, 418, 420, 465, 468, 471, 409, 209, 109 read with 120b of the India Penal Code, 1860 (for short ‘IPC’) read with 13(1)(c), read with 13(1)(D) of Preve....
(National Anti Profiteering Authority
| Jul 19, 2022)
ORDER
The instant Report dated 31.08.2020, has been furnished by the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP), under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017 pursuant to the Interim Order No. 01/2020 dated 01.01.2020 of the National Anti-Profiteering Authority (NAA or the Authority) in respect of earlier DGAP's Report dated 26.06.2019. The Authority vide above said Interim Order had directed the DGAP to reinvestigate the matter under Rule 1....
(National Anti Profiteering Authority
| Jul 19, 2022)
ORDER
The instant Report dated 26.08.2020, received on 31.08.2020 has been furnished by the Applicant No. 2 i.e. Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) under Rule 129(6) of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017 pursuant to the Interim Order No. 16/2019 dated 28,11.2019 of the National Anti-Profiteering Authority (NAA or the Authority) in respect of earlier Report or DGAP dated 26.06.2019. The Authority vide said Interim Order had directed the DGAP to reinvestigate th....