Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search

  13,364 Results

RAJU MITTAL, SH. KUMAR ADITYA AND OTHERS vs. SHRIRAM PROPERTIES PVT. LTD


(National Anti Profiteering Authority | Jul 19, 2022)

1. The present report dated 31.031021 has been furnished by the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP), under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Services Tax (CGST) Rules. 2017, on the basis of application filed by the Applicant No. 1 alleging profiteering in respect of Construction Service supplied by the Respondent. The Applicant No. 1 alleged that the Respondent had not passed on the benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) to him by way of commensurate reduction in the price of the Un....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

PRADEEP GOYAL vs. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS


(Supreme Court | Jul 18, 2022)

M.R. SHAH, J. 1. By way of this Writ Petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner, a Chartered Accountant by profession, by way of present Public Interest Ligation has prayed for an appropriate writ, order or direction to the respondents – respective States and the GST Council to take all necessary steps to implement a system for electronic (digital) generation of a Document Identification Number (DIN) for all communications sent by the State Tax Officers t....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

RAMESHWAR HAVELIA (DOON VALLEY LOGISTICS)


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Uttarakhand | Jul 18, 2022)

PROCEEDINGS 1. This is an application under Sub-Section (1) of Section 97 of the Central Goods & Service Tax Act, 2017 and Uttarakhand State Goods & Service Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as CGST/SGST Act) and the rules made there under filed by M/s Rameshwar Havelia with Trade name M/s Doon Valley Logistics, 271 KA, PO- Harrawala, Kuanwala, Haridwar Road, Dehradun, Uttarakhand- 248160 (herein after referred to as the “applicant”) and registered with GSTIN -05A....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The only point that arises for consideration in these cases is whether a person who opts to make payment in terms of Clause (a) of Sub-Section (1) of Section 129 of the Central Goods & Services Tax Act / State Goods & Services Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as the ‘CGST/SGST Acts’) to get goods/conveyance/documents detained or seized in proceedings under Section 129 released is deprived of his right to file an appeal against the proceedings. While the petitioners in thes....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

RAHUL GAUTAM AND OTHERS vs. HIMALAYA REAL ESTATE PVT. LTD


(National Anti Profiteering Authority | Jul 18, 2022)

ORDER 1. A Report dated 30.12.2020 has been received from the Applicant No. 2 i.e. the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after detailed re-investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017 pursuant to Interim Order No 06/2020 dated 03.01.2020 passed by National Anti-Profiteering Authority (NAA or Authority) in respect of the investigation report of DGAP dated 01.07.2019. The Authority had ordered reinvestigation under the rule ....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

ASP TRADERS vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | Jul 18, 2022)

1. Heard Shri Rahul Agarwal, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Nimai Das, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel along with Shri B.P. Singh Kachhawaha, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. This writ petition has been filed praying for the following relief: "(a) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondent no. 3 to make available the copy of the order passed under Section 129(3) in due compliance of Section 129(....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

HYT ENGINEERING COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Uttar Pradesh | Jul 15, 2022)

The present appeal has been filed under Section 100 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 and Uttar Pradesh Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and UPGST Act”) by M/s HYT Engineering Company Private Limited, New Electric Loco Shed, Opp Saiyedpur Railway Station, Chochakpur Saidpur Road Saiyedpur Bhitri, Ghazipur (hereinafter referred to as the “Appellant”) against the Advance Ruling Order No. UP ADRG 92/2022 dated 24.....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SANDHEERA INFRATECH PRIVATE LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Telangana | Jul 15, 2022)

1. M/s. Sandheera Infratech Private Limited, Office No 901, 9, Taramandal Complex, No 5-9-13, Saifabad, Hyderabad, Telangana - 500 004 (36ABBCS8992E1ZX) has filed an application in FORM GST ARA-01 under Section 97(1) of TGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of CGST/TGST Rules. 2. At the outset, it is made clear that the provisions of both the CGST Act and the TGST Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to any dissimilar provisions, a r....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

RUBBER WORKS vs. STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH AND OTHERS


(Madhya Pradesh High Court | Jul 15, 2022)

Present review petition has been preferred by the petitioner seeking review of the order dated 20-10-2021 passed in Writ Petition No.13142/2021 whereby the petition preferred by the review petitioner has been dismissed. 2. It is the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner that without opportunity of hearing, appeal was dismissed by respondent No.2 -appellate authority on the ground of delay. Appellate authority was not having the jurisdiction to decide the appeal on merits as wel....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

BOLLU SIVA GOPALA KRISHNA


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Telangana | Jul 15, 2022)

1. M/s. Bollu Siva Gopala Krishna, Flat No 401, Saya Sai APTS, Srinivasa Colony (East) Ameerpet, Hyderabad – 500 038. (Un Registered) has filed an application in FORM GST ARA-01 under Section 97(1) of TGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of CGST/TGST Rules. 2. At the outset, it is made clear that the provisions of both the CGST Act and the TGST Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to any dissimilar provisions, a reference to t....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


  Hide
30
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S