Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search

  13,382 Results

ORDER 1. Mr Aditya Singla, who appears on behalf of respondent nos.2 to 7/revenue, has returned with instructions in the matter. 2. Mr Singla has placed before us a compilation of documents, which seem to suggest that the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed. 2.1. A copy of the compilation has been furnished to Ms Anjali Manish, who appears on behalf of the petitioner. 3. Ms Manish says that since the grievance of the petitioner stands redressed, the writ petition ca....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER 1. The present Report dated 02.09.2021 had been received from the Applicant No. 2 i.e. the DGAP (DGAP) after detailed investigation under Rule 129(6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the present case were that an application was filed before the Standing Committee on Anti- profiteering, under Rule 128 of the CGST Rules, 2017 by the Applicant No. 1 alleging that the Respondent did not pass on the benefit of exemption of GST on Sanitary Nap....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petitioner in WP© No.13647 of 2020 has filed this appeal aggrieved by the judgment of the learned Single Judge dated 20.3.2020. 2. The appellant is engaged in the purchase and sale of plywood and is a registered dealer under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act and The Central Sales Tax Act. The case of the appellant is that after having migrated to GST, he had done business only up to the financial year 2017-18. 3. As the appellant discontinued his business, he filed an online app....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. This writ petition is directed against the Order-in-Appeal dated 27.12.2021 passed by the Joint Commissioner (Appeals-I), Central Goods & Service Tax, Delhi. 2. Via the aforesaid order, the appeal of the respondents/revenue was allowed on the ground that the refund claims lodged by the petitioner were beyond time, as prescribed under Section 54 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [in short, the “Act”.] 3. The record shows that on 22.02.2022, when the mat....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s): “i) To issue an appropriate writ, order or direction quashing the order of Appeal passed by the Additional Commissioner of State Tax (Appeal), Patna West Division, Patna (Annexure-3) to this Writ Application) under Section 107 of the Goods and Services Act, 2017 read with rule 108(3) Goods and Services Rules, 2017 whereby the petitioner’s Appeal has been dismissed on the ground of delay. ii) To issue an appropriate writ, o....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

H.B.L. POWER SYSTEMS LTD vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | Jul 27, 2022)

The present petition has been filed challenging the judgment and order dated 19.03.2018 passed by the Adjudicating Authority under the U.P. G.S.T. Act in exercise of powers under Section 129 (3), whereby the goods have released in favour of the petitioner subject to deposit of Rs. 10,46,780/- as tax and a further penalty of Rs. 10,46,780/- as well as the Appellate Order dated 06.11.2018, whereby the appeal preferred by the petitioner was dismissed. The contention of learned counsel for th....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SUBODH KUMAR GARG vs. UNION OF INDIA


(Allahabad High Court | Jul 27, 2022)

Heard Ms. Pragya Pandey, learned counsel for the applicant, Shri Dhananjay Awasthi,learned counsel for the respondent. The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant, Subodh Kumar Garg, with a prayer to release him on bail in File No. DGGI/ARU/Gr.B/S. Traders/23/2021, under Sections 132(1)(c) of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act,2017 District- Agra, during pendency of trial. The applicant is a proprietor of M/s Shree Traders having its principal place of bu....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petitioner, who is a Proprietor served with a notice for cancellation of Registration, dated 04.01.2021. The petitioner submits that due to the Covid-19 Pandemic and nation wide lock down, the petitioner's business was shut down. Further, the petitioner used to engage private accountant for the purpose of filing returns and he alone had the access to the GST portal for filing returns. Since there was no business, the petitioner had not contacted the accountant and inadvertently failed....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

MITAMBINI MISHRA vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS


(Orissa High Court | Jul 26, 2022)

JUDGMENT MURAHARI SRI RAMAN, J.- This matter is taken up by virtual/physical mode.   2. The petitioner by way of writ petition sought to question the propriety of the Demand-cum-Show Cause Notice dated 17.02.2022 vide Annexure-1 issued under Section 63 of the Odisha Goods Services Tax Act, 2017 (for brevity hereinafter referred to as “OGST Act”) in Form GST ASMT-14 prescribed under Rule 100(2) of the Odisha Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 (for short hereinafter....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

DINESH JAIN & MS. MADHU JAIN AND OTHERS vs. SANGHVI PREMISES PVT. LTD.


(National Anti Profiteering Authority | Jul 26, 2022)

ORDER 1. The Present report dated 23.02.2021 had been received by the Authority from the Applicant No. 2, i.e. the Director General of Anti-Profiteering after a detailed investigation under Rule 129(6) of the CGST Rules, 2017. The brief facts if the case was that the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering, received an Application under Rule 128 of the CGST Rules, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as “the Rules”). filed by Applicant No. 1 alleging profiteering in respect of constr....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


  Hide
31
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S