Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search

  13,379 Results

PON PURE CHEMICAL INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Gujrat | Oct 30, 2017)

The application for advance ruling of M/s. Pon Pure Chemical India Pvt. Ltd. was heard on 17.10.2017 on the issue as to whether the application is fit for admission or not. Shri Shivrajan Kalyanaraman was requested on that day to submit the reasons / provisions on following issues by 23/25.10.2017. (i) Whether the authority is within jurisdiction to admit application especially on the issue of ‘place of supply’? (ii) Whether the issue is related to Customs or is related to....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petitioner is aggrieved with the detention of goods at Exhibit P4. The goods are granite purchased by the petitioner from Tamil Nadu and transported to Karamana at Thiruvananthapuram. The petitioner submits that the transport is effected for the purpose of building a residential house; the permit of which is produced at Exhibit P1 and the plan at Exhibit P2. The detention, as is seen from Exhibit P4, was for the reason that the notice issued is that of the Value Added Tax period and also ....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
A consignment of M.S scrap, that was being transported at the instance of the petitioner, was detained by the respondents. Ext.P3 is the detention notice issued to the petitioner. In the writ petition, the petitioner is aggrieved by the insistence of the respondent that the petitioner must pay the security deposit demanded in the detention notice as a condition for release of the goods and vehicle. 2. I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and also the learned Gover....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
A consignment of motor vehicle chasis that was being stock transferred at the instance of the petitioner was detained by the respondent. Ext.P3 is the detention notice issued to the petitioner. In the writ petition, the petitioner is aggrieved by the insistence of the respondent that the petitioner must pay the security deposit demanded in the detention notice as a condition for release of the goods and the vehicle. 2. I have heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and also....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petitioner has approached this Court aggrieved by Exts.P4 and P6 detention notices that have been issued detaining a consignment of goods that was being transported at the instance of the petitioner. On a perusal of Exts.P4 and P6 notices, it is seen that, out of four consignments, three consignments were detained, on the ground that, the goods which were stated to be transported pursuant to an interstate sale were not accompanied by valid documents as prescribed under the State Goods and....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER Heard Sri Rahul Agarwal assisted by Sri Varad Nath and Miss. Archi Agarwal learned counsels for the petitioner. Sri V.K.S. Raghuvanshi, appeared for the respondent no.4, Sri C.B. Tripathi for the respondent nos.1 and 5 and Sri Arvind Kumar Kushwaha holding the brief of Sri Prem Shankar Prasad, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 3 and 6. With the consent of the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the respective parties, the present writ petition is disposed of finally wi....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER Heard Mr.S.Doraisamy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.R.Rajeswaran, learned Special Government Pleader accepts notice for respondents 1 to 4. With the consent on either side, the Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal. 2. The petitioner is an association registered under the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Societies Registration Act, 1975 bearing Registration No.242/2010. The Association was formed for the Welfare of the members of the Road Contractors, who have bee....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER 1. Mr. Harpreet Singh, the learned Senior Standing Counsel for Respondent Nos. 2 and 4, has produced before the Court, Notification No. 37/2017-Central Tax, dated 4th October 2017, issued by the Central Board of Excise and Customs, whereby the grievance of the Petitioner in the present petition no longer survives. 2. In that view of the matter, the present petition is disposed of along with the pending application. ....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER Heard Dr.S.Krishnanadh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.A.P.Srinivas, learned Senior standing counsel for the respondent. 2. The petitioner has challenged an Order-in-Original, dated 24.08.2017, issued under Section 17(5) of the Customs Act, 1962. By the impugned order, the respondent has denied the petitioner's claim for the benefit of a notification with respect to description of the goods under serial No.196 of Schedule II of notification 1/2017-integrated Tax (....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER The petitioner is an association registered under the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Societies Act bearing Registration No.81/2012. The Association was formed for the Welfare of the members of the Road Contractors, who have been carrying on works for the National Highways and Highways department and other Governmental organisation. 2. The contractors used to remit 2% tax on value for the works executed by them towards the Works Contract Tax under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax, 20....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


  Hide
31
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S