Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

ANKUSH AUTO DEALS vs. COMMISSIONER OF DGST AND OTHERS
(Delhi High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

RAJIV SHAKDHER
TARA VITASTA GANJU
Pet. Counsel
Vasdev Lalwani
Rohit Gautam
Res. Counsel
Rishikesh Kumar
Seema Priya
Muhammad Zaid

Petitioner / Applicant

ANKUSH AUTO DEALS
Respondent COMMISSIONER OF DGST AND OTHERS
Court Delhi High Court
State

Delhi

Date Jul 21, 2022
Order No.

W.P.(C) 12233/2021 & CM APPL.4315/2022

Citation

2022(7) TAXREPLY 6153
Original Order
My Favorites
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Related Tags :

TaxGPT Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
OR
Listen this case in simple words  
Audio Timeline
  AA   |   Print

ORDER

1. On the previous date i.e., 12.05.2022, we had recorded as follows: “1. The counsel for the petitioner informs us that the grievance of the petitioner has been partially addressed, as the principal amount towards refund has already been remitted. 1.1. Therefore, according to learned counsel for the petitioner, what remains is the payment of statutory interest. 1.2. This position is affirmed by the counsel for the respondents. 2. As a matter of fact, a copy of the order dated 22.03.2022, passed by the Goods and Service Tax Officer (GSTO), Ward-72, Department of Trade & Taxes has been placed before us. 2.1. The calculation, as reflected in the said order, insofar as the petitioner is concerned reads as follows : "(1) Refund claimed by the taxpayer: Rs.25,29,944/- (2) Refund already granted Rs.14,22,482/- (3) Refund to be further allowed Rs.11,07,462/-"” 3. Clearly, the concerned officer has not addressed the petitioner&rs....

Premium Content !

This is premium content of TaxReply, available to paid subscribers only.

Kindly Subscribe GST Library to unlock all features.
View Subscription Plans
Download Full Judgement :
  Hide
31
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S