Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  13,161 Results

ORDER 1. This petition has been filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following reliefs:- "(i) The present writ petition may kindly be allowed; (ii) The Respondent no. 3 may kindly be directed to give appeal effect of the order dated 11/01/2021 passed by the respondent no. 2 the appellate authority to consider the investment made by the petitioner in construction of building in the total investment in fixed capital assets and grant...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

MADHUSUDAN BANIK vs. STATE OF WEST BENGAL & OTHERS


(Calcutta High Court | Feb 10, 2025)

ORDER Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner relied on Sub-Section 9 of Section 107 of the GST Act, 2017 and submits that the Appellate authority must grant three (03) adjournments and give proper opportunity of hearing and relies on Section 107 of the GST Act. Section 107(9) of the ST Act is reproduced hereinbelow:- “Section 107 (9) The Appellate Authority may, if sufficient cause is shown at any stage of hearing of an appeal, grant time to the parties or any of them ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

GEM GRANITES vs. THE STATE TAX OFFICER & OTHERS


(Madras High Court | Feb 10, 2025)

ORDER This writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned order dated 30.08.2024 passed by the 1st respondent. 2. Ms.Amirta Poonkodi Dinakaran, learned Government Advocate, takes notice on behalf of the respondents. By consent of the parties, the main writ petition is taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself. 3. When the matter was taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that though he had sought for larger relief in this petitio...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SHILPKAL BUILDCON vs. COMMISSIONER OF CGST AND OTHERS


(Madhya Pradesh High Court | Feb 10, 2025)

ORDER PER: JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA 1. Petitioner impugns show cause notice dated 11.10.2023, whereby show cause notice was issued to the petitioner for cancellation of GST registration. Petitioner also impugns order dated 12.01.2024, whereby the registration of the petitioner has been cancelled. Further petitioner impugns order dated 02.04.2024, whereby the application for revocation of cancellation was dismissed. 2. Petitioner is in the business of construction of buildings and ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

INDUS TOWERS LTD vs. THE UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS


(Bombay High Court | Feb 10, 2025)

P.C. 1. The above Writ Petition is filed seeking the following reliefs:- “(a) that this Hon’ble Court be pleased to issue a Writ of Certiorari and/or a writ in the nature of Certiorari or any other writ, order or direction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India calling for the records pertaining to the Notice having File No. GEXCOM/SCN/GST/4288/2024-CGST-RANGE-2-DIV-4-COMMRTE-DAMAN/500 for AY 2019-20 dated 17.01.2025 seeking to recover tax arrears of an amount of R...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that a show cause notice has been issued to the petitioner and on the basis of the said show cause notice an adjudication order was passed on 19.07.2024. 2. Learned counsel challenges the adjudication order on the following three grounds:- (i) That the adjudication order was passed without giving an opportunity of hearing. (ii) That the adjudication order was passed without granting opportunity to file written notes of reply ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
COMMON ORDER Heard Mr.N.V.Balaji, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.M.Venkateshwaran, learned Special Government Pleader (Taxes) who takes notice on behalf of the respondents. With consent, the main Writ Petitions are taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself. 2. The challenge in W.P.No.4003 of 2025 is to the order passed first respondent under Section 161 of the Tamil Nadu Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 /Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 20...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER 1. This writ petition has been preferred seeking the following reliefs:- “(a) issue an appropriate writ, order, or direction in the nature of Certiorari to quash, and set aside the summons dated 16.01.2025 & 23.01.2025, issued by the Proper officer attached to the office of Respondent, directing the petitioner to appear and submit documents that have already been submitted to both the DGGI and the State Authority; as violative of Section 6 of the CGST Act; (b) issu...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

BINOY KOLAY vs. SENIOR JOINT COMMISSIONER & OTHERS


(Calcutta High Court | Feb 7, 2025)

ORDER Report filed by the respondent authorities is kept with the record. Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was served with an order for the period 2017-2018 on 30th of March, 2023 against which an appeal was preferred by the petitioner and the appellate authority rejected the appeal on the ground of limitation. In the meantime, a second adjudication order was passed by the authorities for the self same period. Learned Counsel prays for quash...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

NEW KING PLUS INDUSTRIES vs. UNION TERRITORY OF J&K AND OTHERS


(Jammu and Kashmir High Court | Feb 7, 2025)

ORDER PER 01. Impugned in this petition filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks to challenge an order bearing No. 2039-43/GS-17/DCST/APPLI/K dated 29th November, 2024 and order dated 17th November, 2023, passed by the respondent No. 3, including a show cause notice dated 7th June, 2023, issued by the respondent No. 3. 02. The impugned orders are challenged by the petitioner primarily on the ground that the impugned show cause notice...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


15
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
20 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the m/o Apr 2025 (Monthly Taxpayer - Rule 61) - Either Compulsory taxpayer > 5 cr. or Voluntary taxpayer < 5 cr.

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5A

GSTR-5A for the m/o Apr 2025 [Return by OIDAR Service Providers - Rule 64.]

25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).