Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,903 Results

CAV JUDGMENT (PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA) 1. Heard learned Senior Advocate Mr. S.N. Soparkar with learned advocate Mr. Monal Davawala, learned Senior Advocate Mr. Mihir Joshi with learned advocate Mr. Tarak Damani and learned advocate Mr. Aditya Joshi, learned Senior Advocate Mr. Deven Parikh with learned advocate Mr. Nirav P. Shah, learned advocate Mr. Manav Gupta with learned advocate Mr. Parth Shah, learned advocate Mr. Rajat Bose with learned advocate Mr. Sarvas...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
COMMON ORDER These writ petitions are filed challenging the impugned orders dated 30.01.2024 and 07.03.2024. It is submitted by both the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the respondent that the impugned order dated 30.01.2024, may no longer survive, inasmuch as all the issues covered in 30.01.2024 were reconsidered and fresh orders were passed vide impugned order dated 07.03.2024. In view thereof, the challenge to the impugned order dated 30.01.2024 in W.P.No.38648 of 2024, m...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
COMMON ORDER The petitioner is before this Court against the respective Assessment Orders all dated 03.02.2021 confirming the demand of GST for the Assessment Years 2017-2018, 2018-2019, 2019-2020. 2. The petitioner appears to be a dealer in scrap steel and had transactions with the following dealers during the respective Assessment Years: Sl.No. Assessment Years Dealer's Name 1 ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Order on Board 1. The petitioner has preferred this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order (Annexure P-2) dated 26-4- 2024 passed by the respondent No. 2/ Joint Commissioner, Central Goods and Service Tax and Central Excise Tax, Raipur (hereinafter, Goods and Service Tax would be referred to as ‘GST’) seeking following reliefs :- “10.1 This Hon'ble court may kindly be pleased to issue appropriate writ/order/direction an...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER The present writ petition is filed challenging the impugned order dated 14.11.2023 for the assessment year 2020-21. 2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is registered under the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. During the relevant period 2020-21, the petitioner filed its returns and paid the appropriate taxes. On scrutiny of returns, it was noticed that the petitioner has claimed excess input tax credit on inward RCM supplies in GSTR 3...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER PER This is the second round of litigation before this Court. Earlier, the petitioner had filed W.P.No.15467 of 2020 for a mandamus to direct the respondent No.7 to dispose of the petitioner's letter dated 18.06.2020 filed by the petitioner seeking permission to file a revised GSTR-3B for the months from July 2017 to November 2017. 2. The said writ petition was dismissed as infructuous in the light of the order dated 30.09.2020 impugned herein. Relevant portion of the impugn...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER The present writ petition is filed challenging the impugned order dated 27.08.2024 whereby the petitioner's claim of Input Tax Credit was sought to be disallowed on the premise that it is ineligible by invoking Section 17(5) of the GST Act. 2. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the impugned notice while proposing to invoke Section 17(5) of the GST Act had only stated that the Input Tax Credit shall not be available in respect of the list of commod...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER Heard Ms.E.Ann Priscilla Swarnakumari, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.R.Suresh Kumar, learned Additional Government Pleader for the respondents. 2. The present Writ Petition is filed challenging the order of the cancellation of the registration of the petitioner on the premise that the statutory returns has not been filed for a continuous period of six months, thereby invoking Section 29(2) of CGST Act. 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER The petitioner is before this Court against the impugned Assessment Order passed by the respondent for the Assessment Year 2019-2020 dated 26.11.2021. By the impugned order, the respondent has confirmed the taxable turnover of the petitioner and has computed the tax as follows:- Taxable turnover determined   Rs.10,34,32,205-00 @18%   SGST @ 9% ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
JUDGMENT ( PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA ) 1. Heard learned advocate Mr. Anand Nainawati for the petitioner and learned advocate Mr. Param Shah for the respondents. 2. Rule returnable forthwith. Learned advocate Mr. Param Shah waives service of notice of rule on behalf of the respondents. 3. Having regard to the controversy arising in the writ petitions with narrow compass with the consent of learned advocates, the matters are taken up for hearing. (i) Thes...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


25
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 Apr

☑ Half-Yearly | ITC-04

ITC-04 for the half year (Oct - Mar 2025) (For taxpayers > 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

☑ Annual | ITC-04

ITC-04 for complete FY 2024-25 (For taxpayers <= 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)