Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,903 Results

ORDER HON’BLE PIYUSH AGRAWAL, J. 1. Heard Sri Aditya Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Ravi Shanker Pandey, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. By means of instant writ petition, the petitioner has made the following prayer:- "I. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of the certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 27.02.2024 passed by the respondent no.1 in Appeal No.KNP/06/067/2019, F.Y. 2019-20 unde...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER   The present Writ Petition is filed challenging the impugned order dated 17.04.2024 passed by the first respondent relating to the assessment year 2018~19 on the ground of violation of principles of natural justice.   2. Mrs.K.Vasanthamala, learned Government Advocate, takes notice on behalf of the respondents 1 and 2. By consent of the parties, the main Writ Petition is taken up for disposal at the admission.   3. It is submitted by the learned...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER The common issue raised in all these Writ Petitions is with regard to compliance of Section 169 of the Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax Act 2017, (in short, 'the Act'). 2. It is the contentions of the learned counsels for the petitioners that the respondents in each of the cases had uploaded only the notices/ orders in the web portal and not by any other modes as prescribed under Section 169 of the Act. 3. It is their case that most of the petitioners are not well a...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER Heard Mr. A. Goyal, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. B. Gogoi, learned Standing Counsel for the Finance and Taxation. 2. The petitioner has state that he used to deal in the business of printing materials at Guwahati in the State of Assam in the name and style of M/s. Print Sales Company and for the purpose of carrying the business, he had registered himself under the Goods and Services Tax [GST] vide Registration no. GSTIN/ID:18ABKPV4571C1ZD. 3. The petiti...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER ( PER : HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MRS. JUSTICE SUNITA AGARWAL ) 1. The present petition has been filed by a person, who claims to be the owner of the seized goods, which were detained along with the vehicle in transit, by invoking the provisions of Section 130 of the Gujarat Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017(in short as ‘the GGST Act’ 2017’)/ Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (in short as ‘the CGST Act’ 2017’) . 2. The petitioner ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
JUDGMENT The petitioner in these writ petitions is engaged in the wholesale trade of gold, precious metals and ornaments made therefrom to various jewellery shops in different States and is a registered dealer under the provisions of the Goods and Services Tax Act (GST Act). Since common issues arise for consideration in these writ petitions, they are disposed of by this common judgment. The status of parties and the documents referred to in this judgment will be as obtaining in W.P.(C) N...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
P.C. 1. The above Writ Petition seeks Writ of Certiorari to quash and set aside the show cause-cum-demand notice dated 4th December 2024 issued to the Petitioner under Section 74 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 for the period 1st July 2018 to 31st March 2023. The other relief sought is to restrain the Respondents or prohibit them from acting further and/or taking any steps and/or act pursuant to the said impugned show cause notice. 2. The only ground canvassed before u...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
COMMON ORDER The common issue raised in all these Writ Petitions is with regard to compliance of Section 169 of the Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax Act 2017, (in short, 'the Act'). 2. It is the contentions of the learned counsels for the petitioners that the respondents in each of the cases had uploaded only the notices/ orders in the web portal and not by any other modes as prescribed under Section 169 of the Act. 3. It is their case that most of the petitioners are not...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

ANIL KUMAR TIRTHANI


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Rajasthan | Jan 3, 2025)

Note 1: Under Section 100 of the CGST/RGST Act, 2017, an appeal against this ruling lies before the Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, constituted under Section 99 of CGST/RGST Act, 2017, within a period of 30 days from the date of service of this order. Note 2: At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the CGST Act and the RGST Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to such dissimilar provision...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

BHAGVAN TIRTHANI


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Rajasthan | Jan 3, 2025)

Note 1: Under Section 100 of the CGST/RGST Act, 2017, an appeal against this ruling lies before the Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, constituted under Section 99 of CGST/RGST Act, 2017, within a period of 30 days from the date of service of this order. Note 2: At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the CGST Act and the RGST Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to such dissimilar...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


25
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 Apr

☑ Half-Yearly | ITC-04

ITC-04 for the half year (Oct - Mar 2025) (For taxpayers > 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

☑ Annual | ITC-04

ITC-04 for complete FY 2024-25 (For taxpayers <= 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)