Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,903 Results

COMMON ORDER (PER HON’BLE SUJOY PAUL,J): In this batch of writ petitions, the petitioners have called in question the legality, validity and propriety of notification Nos. 13/2022, dated 05.07.2022, 9 and 56/2023, dated 31.03.2023 and 28.12.2023, respectively. The pari materia/ corresponding notification Nos. 118/2023, dated 25.08.2023 and 170/2023, dated 17.12.2023 issued by State of Telangana are also subject matter of challenge. These notifications are admittedly issued in pu...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner for directing the respondents to hear the petitioner and allow him to tender his explanation or in the alternative to permit the petitioner to file appeal by extending 15 days time over and above the period granted in amnesty for filing of the appeal after providing correct credentials to the petitioner. 2. It is stated that the assessment order was never communicated to the petitioner and, as such, the petitioner was not in...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The Court made the following order: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao) The petitioner was served with assessment order in Form GST DRC-07, dated 12.01.2022 and Form GST DRC-08, dated 18.01.2022, passed by the 3rd respondent, under the Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 [for short “the GST Act”], for the period 2017 to 2022. These orders have been challenged by the petitioner in the present writ petition. 2. These assessment orders, in Form GST DRC-07 and F...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SD EXPORTS vs. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND OTHERS


(Andhra Pradesh High Court | Dec 31, 2024)

ORDER ( Per Hon’ble Sri Justice R Raghunandan Rao) The Court made the following order:(per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao) The petitioner was served with assessment orders in Form GST DRC- 07, dated 07.06.2022, 07.06.2022 and 08.01.2022, passed by the 2nd respondent, under the Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 [for short “the GST Act”], for the period 2018-19 to 2020-21 respectively. These orders have been challenged by the petitioner in the present writ ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER PER (HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO) 1. The petitioner was served with an assessment order, in Form GST DRC-07, dated 30.04.2024, passed by the 1st respondent, under the Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 [for short “the GST Act”], for the period 2019 to 2020. This order has been challenged by the petitioner in the present writ petition. 2. This assessment order, in Form GST DRC-07, is challenged by the petitioner, on various grounds, including the gro...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

GACL-NALCO ALKALIES & CHEMICALS PRIVATE LIMITED.


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Gujrat | Dec 30, 2024)

At the outset we would like to make it clear that the provisions of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and Gujarat Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘CGST Act, 2017’ and the ‘GGST Act, 2017’) are pari materia and have the same provisions in like matter and differ from each other only on a few specific provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is particularly made to such dissimilar provisions, a reference to the CGST Act, 2017 wou...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SIKKA PORTS & TERMINALS LIMITED.


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Gujrat | Dec 30, 2024)

At the outset we would like to make it clear that the provisions of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and Gujarat Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘CGST Act, 2017’ and ‘GGST Act, 2017’) are pari materia and have the same provisions in like matter and differ from each other only on a few specific provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is particularly made to such dissimilar provisions, a reference to the CGST Act, 2017 would a...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, CGST, AHMEDABAD NORTH .. vs. EMCURE PHARMACEUTICALS LTD.


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Gujrat | Dec 30, 2024)

At the outset we would like to make it clear that the provisions of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and Gujarat Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘CGST Act, 2017’ and the ‘GGST Act, 2017’) are pari materia and have the same provisions in like matter and differ from each other only on a few specific provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is particularly made to such dissimilar provisions, a reference to the CGST Act, 2017 wou...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

AOROM HERBOTECH


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Gujrat | Dec 30, 2024)

At the outset we would like to make it clear that the provisions of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and Gujarat Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘CGST Act, 2017’ and the ‘GGST Act, 2017’) are pari materia and have the same provisions in like matter and differ from each other only on a few specific provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is particularly made to such dissimilar provisions, a reference to the CGST Act, 2017 wou...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

S.P. SINGLA CONSTRUCTIONS P LTD.


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Gujrat | Dec 30, 2024)

At the outset we would like to make it clear that the provisions of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and Gujarat Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘CGST Act, 2017’ and the ‘GGST Act, 2017’) are pari materia and have the same provisions in like matter and differ from each other only on a few specific provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is particularly made to such dissimilar provisions, a reference to the CGST Act, 2017 wou...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


25
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 Apr

☑ Half-Yearly | ITC-04

ITC-04 for the half year (Oct - Mar 2025) (For taxpayers > 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

☑ Annual | ITC-04

ITC-04 for complete FY 2024-25 (For taxpayers <= 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)