^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes

GST Forms

My Favourites ^New

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Staff Manager ^New

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

SRI BHAGAVATHI GRANITES INDUSTRIES vs. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF CENTRAL TAX
(Telangana High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

SUJOY PAUL
RENUKA YARA

Pet. Counsel

M Naga Deepak

Res. Counsel

Dominic Fernandes

Petitioner / Applicant	SRI BHAGAVATHI GRANITES INDUSTRIES
Respondent	THE SUPERINTENDENT OF CENTRAL TAX
Court	Telangana High Court
State	Telangana
Date	Apr 9, 2025
Order No.	WRIT PETITION No. 25839 of 2024
Citation	2025(4) TAXREPLY 13667
Original Order
My Favorites	Add to Fav ☆ Add to favorites.

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
Sri M.Naga Deepak, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Pravalika, learned counsel representing Sri Dominic Fernandes, learned Senior Standing Counsel for CBIC, appearing for respondent Nos.1 to 3. 2. The petitioner suffered an Order-in-Original on 06.01.2022. This writ petition is filed on 18.09.2024. 3. The petitioner, admittedly, did not prefer any appeal against the Order-in-Original dated 06.01.2022. The singular argument advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner is that providing the DRC-07 before passing the Order-in-Original was mandatory and the same was issued only on 24.09.2024. Thus, even if Order-in-Original is not called in question, the bank attachment founded upon a defective Order-in-Original without furnishing DRC-07 is liable to be interfered with. 4. Ms. Pravalika, learned counsel representing Sri Dominic Fernandes, learned Senior Standing Counsel for CBIC, opposed the prayer on the basis of memo filed by respondent Nos.1 to 3 and urged tha....