Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


1
TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option
Active Filters:
State - Telangana ✔

  324 Results

ORDER HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE SUJOY PAUL): Sri Y. Siri Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner; Sri Swaroop Oorilla, learned Special Government Pleader for State Tax, for respondent Nos.1 to 3 and Sri B. Mukherjee, learned counsel representing Sri Gadi Praveen Kumar, learned Deputy Solicitor General of India, for respondent No.4. 2. With the consent, finally heard. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the impugned show cause notice was issued bey...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

A1 ADIL TRADERS vs. DEPUTY STATE TAX OFFICER


(Telangana High Court | Mar 4, 2025)

ORDER ( Per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Sujoy Paul ) Sri M. Uma Shankar, learned counsel represents Sri V. Veeresham, learned counsel for the petitioner; Sri T. Chaitanya Kiran, learned Assistant Government Pleader representing Sri Swaroop Oorilla, learned Special Government Pleader for State Tax, for respondent Nos.1 and 3 and Ms. Pravalika, learned counsel representing Sri Dominic Fernandes, learned Senior Standing Counsel for CBIC, for respondent No.2. 2. With th...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER ( Per Hon’ble The Acting Chief Justice ) In this batch of Writ Petitions, the petitioners have challenged the legality, validity and propriety of the show-cause notices and final orders which admittedly do not contain physical or digital signatures of the Proper Officer, although the impugned show-cause notices and final orders were placed on the portal. Contention of the Petitioners:- 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners commenced their arguments by placing reli...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

MADDI SEETHA DEVI.


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Telangana | Feb 20, 2025)

(Passed under Section 101 (1) of the Telangana Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) PREAMBLE 1. In terms of Section 102 of the Telangana Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (TGST Act, 2017 or the Act), this Order may be amended by the Appellate authority so as to rectify any error apparent on the face of the record, if such error is noticed by the Appellate authority on its own accord, or is brought to its notice by the concerned officer, the jurisdictional officer or the appellant within a...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

NAVYA NUCHU


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Telangana | Feb 20, 2025)

(Passed under Section 101 (1) of the Telangana Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) PREAMBLE 1. In terms of Section 102 of the Telangana Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (TGST Act, 2017 or the Act), this Order may be amended by the Appellate authority so as to rectify any error apparent on the face of the record, if such error is noticed by the Appellate authority on its own accord, or is brought to its notice by the concerned officer, the jurisdictional officer or the appellant within a...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

VAISHNAOI INFRATECH AND DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Telangana | Feb 20, 2025)

(Passed under Section 101 (1) of the Telangana Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) PREAMBLE 1. In terms of Section 102 of the Telangana Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (TGST Act, 2017 or the Act), this Order may be amended by the Appellate authority so as to rectify any error apparent on the face of the record, if such error is noticed by the Appellate authority on its own accord, or is brought to its notice by the concerned officer, the jurisdictional officer or the applicant within a...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

GEEKAY WIRES LIMITED


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Telangana | Feb 20, 2025)

(Passed under Section 101 (1) of the Telangana Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) PREAMBLE 1. In terms of Section 102 of the Telangana Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (TGST Act, 2017 or the Act), this Order may be amended by the Appellate Authority so as to rectify any error apparent on the face of the record, if such error is noticed by the Appellate Authority on its own accord, or is brought to its notice by the concerned officer, the jurisdictional officer or the appellant within a...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

DUET INDIA HOTELS (HYDERABAD) PRIVATE LIMITED.


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Telangana | Feb 20, 2025)

(Passed under Section 101 (1) of the Telangana Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) PREAMBLE 1. In terms of Section 102 of the Telangana Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (TGST Act, 2017 or the Act), this Order may be amended by the Appellate authority so as to rectify any error apparent on the face of the record, if such error is noticed by the Appellate authority on its own accord, or is brought to its notice by the concerned officer, the jurisdictional officer or the applicant within a...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

TELANGANA STATE TECHNOLOGY SERVICES LIMITED.


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Telangana | Feb 20, 2025)

PREAMBLE 1. In terms of Section 102 of the Telangana Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (TGST Act, 2017 or the Act), this Order may be amended by the Appellate authority so as to rectify any error apparent on the face of the record, if such error is noticed by the Appellate authority on its own accord, or is brought to its notice by the concerned officer, the jurisdictional officer or the appellant within a period of six months from the date of the order. Provided that, no rectification whi...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

KIRBY BUILDING SYSTEMS & STRUCTURES INDIA PRIVATE ..


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Telangana | Feb 20, 2025)

PREAMBLE 1. In terms of Section 102 of the Telangana Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (TGST Act, 2017 or the Act), this Order may be amended by the Appellate authority so as to rectify any error apparent on the face of the record, if such error is noticed by the Appellate authority on its own accord, or is brought to its notice by the concerned officer, the jurisdictional officer or the appellant within a period of six months from the date of the order. Provided that, no rectification whi...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


24
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
24 Apr

☑ Quarterly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the Quarter Jan - Mar 2025 (QRMP Taxpayers < 5 Cr - Rule 61) - Category II States.  

* State Category II - Himachal Pradesh, Punjab, Uttarakhand, Haryana, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Sikkim, Arunachal Pradesh, Nagaland, Manipur, Mizoram, Tripura, Meghalaya, Assam, West Bengal, Jharkhand or Odisha or the Union territories of Jammu and Kashmir, Ladakh, Chandigarh and Delhi.

25 Apr

☑ Half-Yearly | ITC-04

ITC-04 for the half year (Oct - Mar 2025) (For taxpayers > 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

☑ Annual | ITC-04

ITC-04 for complete FY 2024-25 (For taxpayers <= 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)