Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,927 Results

GANESHI LAL AND SONS vs. STATE OF UP AND OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | May 7, 2024)

ORDER HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. 1. Heard Sri Aloke Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Sri Ravi Shanker Pandey, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, wherein the petitioner is aggrieved by order dated November 26, 2022 passed by the respondent No.3/Assistant Commissioner State Tax, Sector-4, Gorakhpur under Section 74 of the Uttar Pra...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Rishi Kumar, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, wherein the petitioner challenges the order in original for cancellation of registration dated November 10, 2022 passed by the respondent No.3/Assistant Commissioner, State Tax, Division- 5, Bareilly and the order passed in appeal dated April 6, 202...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. 1. Heard Ms. Pooja Talwar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Ravi Shanker Pandey, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the petitioner is aggrieved by an order dated December 22, 2021 passed under Section 129(3) of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as "the Act") levying p...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
JUDGMENT (T.S. SIVAGNANAM, C.J.) 1. We have heard the learned advocates for the parties. 2. With the consent of the learned advocates of either side, the appeal and the writ petition are taken up for disposal and are disposed of by this common judgment and order. 3. The appellant had filed the writ petition challenging an adjudication order passed by the Assistant Commissioner of Revenue, State Tax, West Bengal, Strand Road, Chinabazar and Rajakatra Charge dated 1st February, ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER Heard the learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner. No case for interference is made out in exercise of our jurisdiction under Article 136 of the Constitution of India. The Special Leave Petition is accordingly dismissed. Pending application also stands disposed of. ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

RONALDO EARNEST IGNATIO vs. STATE OF ODISHA


(Orissa High Court | May 6, 2024)

ORDER PER 1. Under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. the BLAPL has been filed by the petitioner in jail custody, in connection with 2(c) CC No. 61 of 2023 (F. No. DGGI/BbZU/07/GST/2023 dated 11.07.2023) pending in the court of the learned SDJM, Bhubaneswar for alleged commission of offence under Section 69 of Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 read with Sections 132 (1) (b), 132 (1) (c), 132 (1) (f) of the CGST Act, 2017. Since the earlier BLAPL No. 9999 of 2023 filed by the co-accused aris...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORAL JUDGMENT Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE The instant writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking multifarious reliefs. 2. The petitioner essentially is desirous of availing statutory remedy of appeal against the impugned order before the Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as "Tribunal") under Section 112 of the Bihar Goods and Services Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as "B.G.S.T. Act"). 3. However, du...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

PROBIR GHOSH vs. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & OTHERS


(Calcutta High Court | May 6, 2024)

ORDER 1. Affidavit of service filed in Court today is retained with the record. 2. The present writ petition has been filed, inter alia, challenging the pre show cause notice dated 22nd November 2022 issued under Section 74 of the WBGST Act, 2017 Hereinafter referred to as the “said Act” , the show cause notice dated 31st March 31st March 2023 issued for the period 2017-18 and the order dated 16th June 2023 issued by the respondent no. 3 forming annexure P-9 to t...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

PREM RAJ MEENA vs. STATE OF HARYANA


(Punjab and Haryana High Court | May 6, 2024)

ORDER ANOOP CHITKARA , J. FIR No. Dated Police Station Sections 06 09.02.2024 ACB Karnal, District Anti Corruption Bureau, Haryana 120-B, 384 IPC, 7, 7-A of PC (Section 13(1) (b) r/w 13(2) of PC Act added later on) 1. The petitioner, incarcerated in the FIR captioned above, has come up ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. The present writ petition has been filed, inter alia, Challenging the order dated 29th December, 2023, passed under Section 73 of the West Bengal Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the “said Act”). 2. Mr. Chowdhury, learned advocate appearing in support of the petition by drawing attention of this Court to the summary of the show-cause notice, appearing at page 118 of the writ petition, submits that although, a notice in Form GST DRC 01 had been is...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


26
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)