Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,922 Results

JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL) 1. Petitioner impugns Show Cause Notice dated 17.07.2023 and order dated 02.08.2022, whereby the GST registration of the petitioner has been cancelled retrospectively with effect from 09.10.2019. 2. Issue notice. Notice is accepted by learned counsel for respondent. With the consent of parties, the petition is taken up for final disposal. 3. Petitioner claims to be a trader in metal scrap and was registered under the Central Goods and Servi...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

ASHOK KUMAR vs. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER


(Allahabad High Court | May 8, 2024)

ORDER 1. Heard Sri Pranjal Shukla, learned counsel for the assessee and Sri Ankur Agarwal, learned counsel for the revenue. 2. Pursuant to the earlier order, Sri Ankur Agarwal, learned counsel for the revenue has received written instructions. In absence of any dispute as to fact, the matter has been proceeded with the consent of parties at the fresh stage itself. 3. Challenge has been raised to the order dated 05.11.2022 passed by the Assistant Commissioner, State Tax, Sector-6, ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Heard Mr. R.P. Kar, learned Senior Counsel appearing along with Mr. A.N. Ray, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Sunil Mishra, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Revenue. 3. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking to quash the notice issued by opposite party no.4 under Section 74 of OGST Act in Form GST DRC-01 vide Annexure-5 and to issue direction to opposite party no.3 to consider the application f...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

MJ GOLD vs. STATE TAX OFFICER & OTHERS


(Kerala High Court | May 7, 2024)

JUDGMENT GOPINATH P, J. The appellant filed a writ petition challenging the order annexed as Ext.P5 to the writ petition. A learned Single Judge of this Court by judgment dated 01.04.2024, dismissed the writ petition for reasons recorded in the judgment. It was specifically found that the appellant had failed to avail of the opportunities before the original authority and therefore no ground was made out for interference under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 2. The learn...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
JUDGMENT GOPINATH P, J. The appellant had approached this Court challenging Ext.P4 order. The learned Single Judge of this Court declined jurisdiction on the ground that the appellant has an appellate remedy under Section 107 of the CGST / SGST Acts. The grievance of the appellant is that the appellant is unable to upload an appeal though the appellant is still within time to file an appeal against Ext.P4 order in terms of the provisions contained in Section 107 of the CGST / SGST Act...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

GFT FASHION & OTHER vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | May 7, 2024)

ORDER HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Sri Pranjal Shukla, the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State. 2. By means of the instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the validity of an orders dated 21.01.2021 and 27.04.2021 passed by the Assistant Commissioner, State Tax, Sector-8, Lucknow cancelling the registration of the petitioner'...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER This matter is taken up by hybrid mode. 2. Learned Standing Counsel for the Revenue appearing on an advance notice states that as long as delay in filing the revocation application is condoned, and provided the Petitioner complies with all the requirements of paying the taxes, interest, late fee, penalty etc. due, the 3B Return Form filed by the Petitioner will be accepted by the Opposite Parties. 3. In that view of the matter, the delay in Petitioner’s invoking the pr...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. The present writ petition has been filed, inter alia, challenging the order dated 7th February 2024 passed under Section 73 of the WBGST Act, 20171 on the ground of violation of principles of natural justice. 2. It is contended that the respondents, without offering personal hearing to the petitioner, despite recording the factum of personal hearing being offered in the aforesaid order, had disposed of the said proceeding by passing the order dated 7th February 2024. 3. In this cas...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER ( Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari ) Heard Sri Srinivasa Rao Kudupudi, learned counsel representing learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri S.A.V.Sai Kumar, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Commercial Tax. 2. With the consent of both the parties, this writ petition is decided at this stage. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the impugned order dated 10.11.2020 is not signed by the authority and consequently, no order in the eyes ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL) 1. Petitioner impugns order dated 21.12.2023, whereby the impugned show cause notice dated 26.09.2023 proposing a demand of Rs. 46,41,15,492/- against the petitioner has been disposed of and demand including penalty has been raised against the petitioner. The order has been passed under Section 73 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as, “the Act”]. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits th...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


26
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)