^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

BHAVANI METALS vs. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS
(Gujarat High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

BHARGAV D. KARIA
NIRAL R. MEHTA

Pet. Counsel

Abhay Desai

D K Trivedi

Res. Counsel

Siddharth H Dave

Chintan Dave

Petitioner / Applicant	BHAVANI METALS
Respondent	UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS
Court	Gujarat High Court
State	Gujrat
Date	Jul 26, 2024
Order No.	CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR STAY) NO. 1 of 2024 In R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3749 of 2024 With CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR STAY) NO. 2 of 2024 In R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3749 of 2024
Citation	2024(7) TAXREPLY 10633
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
IA ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA) 1. In Special Civil Application No. 3749/2024, notice was issued on 15.03.2024 and thereafter, the matter is admitted vide order dated 27.06.2024. 2. Learned advocate Mr. Abhay Desai for the petitioner submitted that the issue arising in this petition is pertaining to passing of the impugned order under section 74 of the Central/Gujarat Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 [for short ‘the GST Act’]. 3. It was submitted that by the impugned order, the respondent-Authority has not taken into consideration the detailed reply filed by the petitioner while arriving at a conclusion. It was submitted that though the reply is reproduced in the impugned order, none of the contentions raised by the petitioner is dealt with and no reason is assigned as to why reply is not acceptable to the respondent-authority for invoking the provision of section 16 (2) (c) of the GST Act. It was further submitted that the petitio....