Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,922 Results

ORDER HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. 1. Heard Sri Shubham Agrawal, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Sri Rishi Kumar, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing for the State-respondent. 2. Instant writ petition arises out of penalty order dated June 18, 2018 passed under Section 129(3) of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') and the order passed in appeal dated June 14, 2019, under Sec...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER HON’BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. 1. This is a writ petition under article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the petitioner has prayed for the issuance of a writ of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated January 4, 2020 passed in appeal by Additional Commissioner Grade-2 (Appeal), Judicial Division 2nd State Tax, Moradabad/respondent No. 1. The said appeal was preferred against the penalty order dated May 21, 2019 passed by Assistant Commissioner, State Tax, Mobile...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J.(Oral) 1. The Division Bench of this Court in the case of Commissioner of CGST, Panchkula vs. Nestle India Limited in STA-26-2019 decided on 15.02.2023 has held as under: “At the outset, learned counsel for the respondent states that question of determination of the imposition of taxability is a question which can only be considered by the Supreme Court and he has referred to the judgment passed by the Division Bench of this Court in Commissio...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL) 1. Petitioner seeks a direction to the respondent to allow the application of the petitioner seeking cancellation of the GST registration. 2. Issue notice. Notice is accepted by learned counsel for respondent. With the consent of parties, the petition is taken up for final disposal. 3. Petitioner was trading in motor vehicle parts and had obtained GST registration on 17.10.2020. On 26.03.2024, petitioner filed the subject application seekin...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL) 1. Petitioner seeks setting aside of Show Cause Notice dated 06.03.2024, proposing to cancel the GST registration of the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that a reply to the Show Cause Notice was sent by Speed Post on 21.03.2024, however, till date the Show Cause Notice has not been adjudicated. 3. Issue notice. Notice is accepted by learned counsel appearing for respondent, who states that within a period of four weeks...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER Heard Sri B.Satish Sundhar, Senior Counsel, representing Sri Anup Koushik Karavadi, counsel for petitioner; and Mrs. Santhi Chandra, Junior Standing Counsel for CBIC, appearing for the respondents. 2. A preliminary objection has been raised by the Junior Standing Counsel that the impugned order is appealable under statute and in view of statutory alternative remedy of appeal the writ petition deserves not to be entertained. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner does not dispute ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL) 1. Petitioner seeks a direction to the respondents to issue the refund in the sum of Rs.81,79,529/- besides interest due thereon terms of Section 54 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017. 2. Issue notice. Notice is accepted by learned counsel for respondent. With the consent of parties, the petition is taken up for final disposal. 3. Insofar as the case of the petitioner is concerned, petitioner had filed refund claim on 31.01.2024...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. 1. Heard Sri Pranjal Shukla, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Sri Ravi Shankar Pandey, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing for the State-respondent. 2. Instant writ petition arises out of penalty order dated June 23, 2018 passed under Section 129(3) of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') and the order passed in appeal dated May 7, 2019, unde...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL) 1. Petitioner seeks a direction to the respondents to issue the refund in the sum of Rs. 9,69,017/- besides interest due thereon in terms of Section 54 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017. Petitioner further seeks a direction that guideline be issued to proper officer to process all pending applications and issue refund within 60 days and in case of delay, interest to be paid. 2. Issue notice. Notice is accepted by learned counsel fo...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL) 1. Petitioner impugns order dated 03.02.2021 whereby the GST registration of the petitioner was cancelled retrospectively with effect from 01.07.2017 and also impugns Show Cause Notice dated 12.01.2021. 2. Issue notice. Notice accepted by Learned counsel appearing for respondent. With the consent of parties, petition is taken up for final disposal today. 3. Petitioner is engaged in the business of manufacturing and trading of cable wires an...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


26
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)