Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,927 Results

GFT FASHION & OTHER vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | May 7, 2024)

ORDER HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Sri Pranjal Shukla, the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State. 2. By means of the instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the validity of an orders dated 21.01.2021 and 27.04.2021 passed by the Assistant Commissioner, State Tax, Sector-8, Lucknow cancelling the registration of the petitioner'...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER This matter is taken up by hybrid mode. 2. Learned Standing Counsel for the Revenue appearing on an advance notice states that as long as delay in filing the revocation application is condoned, and provided the Petitioner complies with all the requirements of paying the taxes, interest, late fee, penalty etc. due, the 3B Return Form filed by the Petitioner will be accepted by the Opposite Parties. 3. In that view of the matter, the delay in Petitioner’s invoking the pr...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. The present writ petition has been filed, inter alia, challenging the order dated 7th February 2024 passed under Section 73 of the WBGST Act, 20171 on the ground of violation of principles of natural justice. 2. It is contended that the respondents, without offering personal hearing to the petitioner, despite recording the factum of personal hearing being offered in the aforesaid order, had disposed of the said proceeding by passing the order dated 7th February 2024. 3. In this cas...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER ( Per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ravi Nath Tilhari ) Heard Sri Srinivasa Rao Kudupudi, learned counsel representing learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri S.A.V.Sai Kumar, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Commercial Tax. 2. With the consent of both the parties, this writ petition is decided at this stage. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the impugned order dated 10.11.2020 is not signed by the authority and consequently, no order in the eyes ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL) 1. Petitioner impugns order dated 21.12.2023, whereby the impugned show cause notice dated 26.09.2023 proposing a demand of Rs. 46,41,15,492/- against the petitioner has been disposed of and demand including penalty has been raised against the petitioner. The order has been passed under Section 73 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as, “the Act”]. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits th...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Ravi Shankar Pandey, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, wherein the petitioner challenges the order in original for cancellation of registration dated January 20, 2023 passed by the respondent No.2/Assistant Commissioner, (GST) Sector-1, Dhampur Bijnor and the order dated June 15, 2023 passed by ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL) 1. Petitioner impugns order dated 29.12.2023 whereby the impugned Show Cause Notice dated 25.09.2023 proposing a demand of Rs. 5,04,98,487.00/- against the petitioner had been disposed of and demand including penalty has been raised against the petitioner. The order has been passed under Section 73 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). 2. Learned counsel for Petitioner submits that Petitioner had ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

JALAJOGA vs. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL & OTHERS


(Calcutta High Court | May 7, 2024)

1. Affidavit of service filed in Court today is taken on record. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed, inter alia, challenging the refusal on the part of the appellate authority to condone the delay in maintaining the appeal under Section 107 of the West Bengal Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the “said Act”) by its order dated 13th March, 2024. 3. It is the petitioner’s case that being aggrieved with the determination made under Se...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. Affidavit of service filed in Court today is retained with the record. 2. The petitioners are aggrieved by the order passed under Section 73 of the WBGST Act 2017 dated 15th March 2024. 3. The petitioners claim that during the financial year 2018-19 the petitioners had imported certain goods under cover of bill of entries from ONGC Petro Additions Limited, which is a Special Economic Zone Unit. Although, ordinarily the petitioners are not required to make payment of CGST/WBGST with...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL) 1. Petitioner impugns order dated 30.12.2023 whereby the impugned Show Cause Notice dated 27.09.2023 proposing a demand of Rs. 1,84,49,974.00/- against the petitioner has been disposed of and demand including penalty has been raised against the petitioner. The order has been passed under Section 73 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). Petitioner also impugns rectification order dated 30.03.2024 where...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


26
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)