Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,927 Results

JUDGMENT BHASKAR RAJ PRADHAN, J. 1. The rejection of the petitioner’s claim for budgetary support for the period July-September, 2017 even while its claim for October, 2017 to June, 2018 was allowed under the “Scheme of budgetary support under Goods and Services Tax Regime” to the units located in States of Jammu & Kashmir, Uttarakhand, Himachal Pradesh and North East including Sikkim dated 05.10.2017 (the Budgetary Support Scheme) has led to the present litigati...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

RD ENTERPRISES vs. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | May 6, 2024)

ORDER 1. Heard Shri Swetashwa Agarwal, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Parv Agarwal, learned counsel for the revenue. 2. Present petition has been pressed primarily for the following relief : "Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the Respondent no. 2 - Additional Director, Directorate General of Goods and Services Tax Intelligence, Zonal Unit Meerut to release/restore the provisionally attached bank account no. 0693633...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

IMAGE LABS vs. STATE OF UP AND OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | May 6, 2024)

ORDER HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, wherein the petitioner challenges the order in original for cancellation of registration dated May 13, 2020 passed by the respondent No. 3/Assistant Commissioner, State Tax, Sector-4, Kanpur and the order dated April 3, 2024 passed by the respondent No. 2/Additional...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER 1. Affidavits have been filed on behalf of respondent nos. 2 and 3, respectively. They are taken on record. 2. Heard Shri Nikhil Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Krishna Agarawal, learned counsel for the respondent no. 2 and Shri Gopal Verma, learned counsel for the respondent no. 3. 3. Present petition has been filed for the following relief : "Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding respondents no. 2, 3 and 4 to res...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

UNIDOR INDUSTRIES vs. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS


(Rajasthan High Court | May 3, 2024)

Order 1. This petition was filed aggrieved of recovery of the amount during the search conducted by the Goods and Service Tax Authorities and further directions were sought to the respondent to proceed under Sections 73 and 74 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 in accordance with law. During the pendency of the writ petition show cause notice has been issued to the petitioners. 2. In view of the subsequent developments, counsel for the petitioner is not pressing this petit...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

MUKUL BORAH vs. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS


(Gauhati High Court | May 3, 2024)

ORDER Mr. R. S. Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks to withdraw the petition as there are some inadvertent errors and seeks leave to file again. Mr. S. C. Keyal, learned Standing counsel CGST and Mr. B. Chowdhury, learned Standing Counsel, for SGST are present. Prayer is allowed. Accordingly, the matter stands dismissed on withdrawal with liberty, as prayed for. ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL) 1. Petitioner seeks a direction to the respondent to cancel GST registration. 2. Issue notice. Notice is accepted by learned counsel appearing for respondent. With the consent of the parties, petition is taken up for final disposal today. 3. Petitioner was engaged in the business of trading in polymers and possessed a GST registration under the Central Goods and Services Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) since 29.12.2021. 4...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORAL JUDGMENT (PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA) 1. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the notice dated 30.8.2023 issued by the respondent No. 1 in Form GST DRC-01 under Sections 74 (1), 122 (2) and 125 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 (for short ‘the GST Act’) read with Rule 142 (1) of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 (for short ‘the GST Rules’) for Financial Ye...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER CM APPL. 25985/2024 (for exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. This application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 6238/2024 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Adjudicating Authority has misapplied the notification dated 02.06.2021. He submits that on the one hand, the adjudicating authority has held that services are being provided by the petitioner overseas through M/s James Fisher Defence Ltd which is situated in UK and on the othe...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER CM APPL. 15939/2024(Exemption) 1. Exemption is allowed, subject to just exceptions. 2. The application stands disposed of. CM APPL. 15938/2024(condonation of delay of 97 days in filing); CM APPL. 15941/2024 (condonation of delay of 38 days in re-filing); REVIEWPET. 98/2024 and CMAPPL. 15940/2024 (Stay). 3. The only ground explaining the delay in filing the review petition as set out in the application seeking condonation of delay in filing (CM No.15938/2024),...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


26
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)