^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

VENKATESWARA PLASTIC INDUSTRIES vs. BANSILAL SHARMA UDAINARAYAN & OTHERS
(Madras High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY

Pet. Counsel

C. Rekhakumari

Res. Counsel

V. Prasanth Kiran

Petitioner / Applicant	VENKATESWARA PLASTIC INDUSTRIES
Respondent	BANSILAL SHARMA UDAINARAYAN & OTHERS
Court	Madras High Court
State	Tamilnadu
Date	Jul 11, 2024
Order No.	W. P. No. 16797 of 2024 And W. M. P. Nos. 18469 & 18470 of 2024
Citation	2024(7) TAXREPLY 10218
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
ORDER An order in original dated 13.12.2023 is challenged in this writ petition on the ground that the petitioner did not have a reasonable opportunity to contest the tax proposal on merits. The petitioner asserts that he was unaware of proceedings culminating in the impugned order and, therefore, could not participate in such proceedings. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the confirmed tax proposal pertains to the disparity between the petitioner's GSTR 3B returns and the auto populated GSTR 2A. She submits that the petitioner obtained all necessary documents in terms of Circular No.183 and filed a rectification petition on 11.03.2024. Such rectification petition was rejected by order dated 04.04.2024. If provided an opportunity, learned counsel submits that the petitioner would be in a position to establish that only eligible ITC was claimed. On instructions, learned counsel submits that the petitioner agrees to remit a sum of Rs. 25,000/- towards the ....