Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,903 Results

SWAPAN KUMAR GOGOI vs. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND OTHERS


(Gauhati High Court | Sep 26, 2024)

ORDER Heard Mr. J. Abbas, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Ms. U. Das, learned counsel for all the respondents, except the respondent Nos.3 & 4. 2. The petitioner’s case is that the petitioner had participated in a tender process for construction of wholesale fish markets in the district of Dhubri, Barpeta, Hailakandi and Goalpara in the State of Assam. The petitioner had submitted his bid price of Rs. 2,32,14,600/- for construction of the wholesale fish market ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

MAA VINDHYAVASINI IMPEX vs. STATE OF UP AND OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | Sep 26, 2024)

ORDER Hon'ble Piyush Agrawal,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. By means of present petition, the petitioner is, inter alia, praying for the following relief:- "A. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the order of the respondent no.2 dated 30.08.2024. B. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the order of cancellation of registration of the pe...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER 1. Challenging the show cause notice dated 30th July, 2024 for the tax periods 2017-18 (July, 2017-March, 2018) to 2021-22 issued under Section 74 of the Central /West Bengal Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter after referred to as the “said Act”) the instant writ petition has been filed. 2. Mr. Kanodia, learned advocate appearing on behalf of the petitioners would submit that the basis for issuing the show cause lies in the registered tax payer, not paying...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
COMMON ORDER The petitioner is before this Court against three Intimations all dated 25.11.2021 issued to the petitioner for the Assessment Years 2004-2005, 2005- 2006 and 2006-2007. 2. The above Impugned Intimations seek to deny refund of input tax credit debited by the petitioner as a pre-deposit pursuant to order dated 25.03.2015 in W.P.Nos.8584, 8585 and 8586 of 2015. 3. The petitioner had earlier suffered Assessment Orders dated 25.05.2012 w...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER PER 1. Learned counsels for parties are ad-idem that the challenge which is raised to the Show Cause Notice [‘SCN’] in this writ petition would be governed by the decision rendered in DLF Home Developers Limited vs. Sales Tax Officer Class II Avato Ward 107 Special Zone 12 Delhi & Anr. [W.P.(C) 11052/2024 dated 04 September 2024]. 2. While dealing with an identical controversy and where the authorities in purported exercise of powers of the State Goods and S...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
C.A.V. ORDER (PER: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) The petitioner has called in question the correctness and legality of, Investigation carried out under Section 67 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (for short ‘CGST Act’); the validity of the summons to the witness dated 31.07.2021; declaration that the recoveries to the tune of Rs.2.50 crores “extracted coercively” from the petitioner by the respondents on 31.07.2021 vide Payment Chall...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
JUDGMENT YASHWANT VARMA, J. (ORAL) 1. The writ petitioner is aggrieved by the refusal of the respondents to accord it refund of unutilized Input Tax Credit [ITC] amounting to INR 47,33,053/-. The prayer for refund has come to be negated in terms of an Order-in-Original dated 29 June 2021 and which has been affirmed by the Order-in-Appeal dated 07 June 2022 passed by the second respondent. 2. On facts which have remained undisputed, it would appear that the petitioner is ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL) Heard Ms. Nitu Hawelia, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners in WP(C) No. 4379/2024 as well as Mr. A. Goyal, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners in WP(C) No. 3912/2024; WP(C) No. 3910/2024; WP(C) No. 3933/2024; WP(C) No. 4618/2024 and WP(C) No. 4619/2024. I have also heard Mr. B. Gogoi, the learned Standing Counsel of the Finance and Taxation Department of the Government of Assam. 2. Before dealing with the issue i...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER 1. Heard Sri Pranjal Shukla, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri Ankur Agrawal, learned counsel appearing for the respondent. 2. At the outset, Sri Pranjal Shukla, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner states that the petitioner is not pressing the writ petition on Prayer No. 2. The writ petition is being pressed on Prayer No. 1 only. 3. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the writ petitioner is aggrieved by ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER HON'BLE PIYUSH AGRAWAL, J. 1. Heard Sri Devansh Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Arvind Mishra, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. By means of present petition, the petitioner is, inter alia, praying for the following relief:- "(i). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 21.05.2024 passed by Additional Commissioner Grade-2 (Appeal)-II, State Goods and Services Tax, Ghaz...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


25
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 Apr

☑ Half-Yearly | ITC-04

ITC-04 for the half year (Oct - Mar 2025) (For taxpayers > 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

☑ Annual | ITC-04

ITC-04 for complete FY 2024-25 (For taxpayers <= 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)