^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

MUNNI JENERAL STORE vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS
(Allahabad High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

SHEKHAR B. SARAF
VIPIN CHANDRA DIXIT

Pet. Counsel

Vedika Nath

Yashonidhi Shukla

Res. Counsel

C.s.c.

Petitioner / Applicant	MUNNI JENERAL STORE
Respondent	STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS
Court	Allahabad High Court
State	Uttar Pradesh
Date	Dec 18, 2024
Order No.	Writ Tax No. - 2352 of 2024
Citation	2024(12) TAXREPLY 11899
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
ORDER 1. Heard Ms. Vedika Nath, learned counsel for the assessee and Sri Ankur Agarwal, learned counsel for the revenue. 2. Challenge has been raised to the order dated April 16, 2024 passed by the Assistant Commissioner, State Tax, Sector-1, Balia for the tax period April 2018 to March 2019, whereby demand has been raised against the present petitioner. 3. Solitary ground being pressed in the present petition is, the only notice in the proceedings was issued to the petitioner on December 20, 2023 seeking his reply within 30 days. Referring to item no. 3 of the table appended to that notice, it has been pointed out, the Assessing Authority had at that stage itself chosen to not give any opportunity of hearing to the petitioner by mentioning "NA" against column description "Date of personal hearing". Similar endorsements were made against the columns for "Time of personal hearing" and "Venue where personal hearing will be held". Thu....