Login | Register

GST Library

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Contact Us

Our Services

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,903 Results

1. Challenging a show cause notice dated 1st/3rd August, 2024 passed under Section 74 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the “said Act’) in DRC 01, for the tax period 2017-18 to 2020-21, the instant petition has been filed. 2. The petitioner claims to be engaged in the business of flour milling industry. It provides services of milling, fortification and packing of wheat and converting the same into fortified atta and packing thereof. I...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

PARTH RAMESH vs. OFFICE OF SUPERINTENDENT & OTHERS


(Kerala High Court | Sep 30, 2024)

JUDGMENT These writ petitions have been filed challenging orders issued cancelling the registration granted to the petitioners in these cases under the provisions of the CGST / SGST Acts. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners has raised two contentions in support of the prayer for setting aside the order of cancellation. His first contention is that the show cause notice proposing cancellation (in both cases) is issued in Form GST REG - 31, whereas it should have been issued i...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

AYYAPPAN PILLAI vs. THE STATE TAX OFFICER & OTHERS


(Kerala High Court | Sep 30, 2024)

JUDGMENT The petitioner is a registered person under the CGST / SGST Acts. The petitioner was served with Ext.P3 show cause notice under Section 74 of the CGST Act calling upon the petitioner to show cause as to why certain proposals should not be finalized against the petitioner. The petitioner submitted Ext.P4 reply. After considering the reply submitted by the petitioner and after affording to the petitioner an opportunity of being heard, Ext.P5 order was issued by the 2nd respondent c...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER PER: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT, CHIEF JUSTICE This petition is directed against the order dated 20.06.2024 passed by respondent No.3 - Joint Commissioner (Appeals), CGST, Customs & Central Excise, Indore (M.P.), whereby petitioner's appeal against order dated 06.04.2023 passed by the Adjudicating Authority thereby cancelling the GST registration, has been dismissed on the ground of limitation. 2. In the present petition, the petitioner has pleaded th...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

PUSHPA ENTERPRISES vs. STATE OF UP AND OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | Sep 30, 2024)

ORDER HON'BLE PIYUSH AGRAWAL, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. By means of present petition, the petitioner is, inter alia, praying for the following relief:- "i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the order of Respondent No. 2 dated 10.09.2024. ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the order of cancellation of registratio...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

NEW SHANTI RESTAURANT vs. STATE OF UP AND OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | Sep 30, 2024)

ORDER HON'BLE PIYUSH AGRAWAL, J. 1. Heard Ms. Pooja Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. In pursuance of earlier order, instructions have come, which are taken on record. 3. Similar controversy is involved in both the aforesaid writ petitions, as such, with the consent of the parties , both the aforesaid writ petition are being decided by a common order treating Writ Tax No. 1597 of 2024 as...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

RAM INDIA COMPANY vs. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER


(Allahabad High Court | Sep 30, 2024)

ORDER HON'BLE DONADI RAMESH, J. 1. Heard Sri Aditya Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Ankur Agarwal, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. The present petition has been filed praying for the following relief: "(i) Issue a suitable writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned demand of penalty order passed in from GST MOV-09 dated 14.08.2024 passed by the respondent no.2 under the provisions of the CGS...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER Per: Justice Vivek Rusia With the consent of parties, heard finally. The petitioner has filed the present under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of an appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the respondents to reimburse the extra GST amount paid @ 6% from 01.01.2022 to 30.09.2022 along with interest. 02. The petitioner is a Company / Proprietorship Firm engaged in the construction work. The petitioner has been awarded several works vide agreement...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

DIRECTOR GENERAL OF ANTI-PROFITEERING & OTHER vs. IREO WATERFRONT PVT. LTD.


(National Anti Profiteering Authority | Sep 27, 2024)

ORDER 1. The present Report dated 29.07.2024 has been received from the Director-General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after a detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules,2017. 2. The brief facts of the case and findings of investigation conducted by the DGAP are as under- i. The DGAP had submitted an Investigation Report dated 15.12.2021 under Rule 129 of the CGST Rules, 2017, before the National Anti-profiteering Authority (NAA) in...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER & OTHERS vs. RANGA 70 MM.


(National Anti Profiteering Authority | Sep 27, 2024)

ORDER 1. The present Report dated 27.12.2019 had been received from the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (hereinafter referred to as the “DGAP”) on 27.12.2019 by the erstwhile National Anti-Profiteering Authority (hereinafter referred to as the “NAA”) after a detailed investigation under Rule 133 (4) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the “Rules”). 2. Vide the above mentioned Rep...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


25
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 Apr

☑ Half-Yearly | ITC-04

ITC-04 for the half year (Oct - Mar 2025) (For taxpayers > 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

☑ Annual | ITC-04

ITC-04 for complete FY 2024-25 (For taxpayers <= 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)