Login | Register

GST Library

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Contact Us

Our Services

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,903 Results

ORDER The present Writ Petition has been filed for issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records of the impugned order in GSTIN:33AAHCR8631C1ZK/2018-2019 dated 31.05.2024 under Section 74 of the CGST/TNGST Act, 2017 for the financial year 2018-19 on the file of the first respondent and quash the same. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that after issuing show cause notice dated 05.03.2024 by the first respondent, the petitioner filed reply on 18.05.2024...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

TUSHAR GUPTA vs. STATE OF U.P.


(Allahabad High Court | Sep 27, 2024)

ORDER 1. This bunch of bail applications arises out of three first information reports, which are: (i) FIR /Case Crime No. 203 of 2023, dated 04.05.2023, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC, Police Station Noida Sector-20, District Gautam Buddh Nagar (ii) FIR/Case Crime No. 248 of 2023, dated 01.06.2023, under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC, Police Station Noida Sector-20, District Gautam Buddh Nagar, and (iii) FIR/Case Crime No. 255 of 2023, dated 08.06.2003, under Sections 420, 467, ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

TAMIL NADU MEDICAL COUNCIL.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Tamilnadu | Sep 27, 2024)

1. Any appeal against this Advance Ruling order shall lie before the Tamil Nadu State Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Chennai under Sub-Section (1) Section 100 of CGST Act 2017/ TNGST Act 2017, within 30 days from the date on the ruling sought to be appealed, is communicated. 2. In terms of Section 103 (1) of the Act. Advance Ruling pronounced by the Authority under Chapter XVII of the Act shall be binding only- (a) on the applicant who had sought it in respect of any matter t...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER HON'BLE PANKAJ PUROHIT, J. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits he may be permitted to file an affidavit in the Court for the purpose of removing the defect. Prayer, so made, is granted. Affidavit is taken on record. The defect, as pointed out by the Registry is, therefore, stood cured. 2. Petitioner is a proprietorship firm who runs a business under the name and style of ‘Kiran Enterprises’. Petitioner deals with works contract. Petitioner is registere...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER The Court made the following Judgment : ( Per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao ) The petitioner is a Public Limited Company engaged in the business of manufacturing and sale of gold, diamond, silver, platinum and articles of Jewellery. The petitioner has registered itself earlier under the Andhra Pradesh Value Added Tax Act, 2005 [for short “the APVAT Act, 2005”] and had been carrying on business in the State of Andhra Pradesh. Upon the introduction o...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA) 1. Heard learned advocate Mr. Abhay Y. Desai through video conference for the petitioners and learned Assistant Government Pleader Mr. Raj Tanna for respondents. 2. By this petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs: “A. Your Lordships may be pleased to admit this petition; B. Your Lordships may be pleased to allow this petition; C...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA) 1. Heard learned advocate Mr. Darshan Gandhi for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader Mr. Chintan Dave for the respondent. 2. By this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for quashing and setting aside the order passed under section 73 (9) of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act,2017 [for short ‘the CGST Act’] in Form GST DRC-07 dated 04.04.2022 ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
JUDGMENT PER (HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MS. RITU BAHRI) The petitioner M/s New Jai Hind Transport Service is a proprietorship firm and providing services of Goods Transport Agency (in short GTA) to its customers / service recipients. 2) The petitioner is challenging the order passed by learned Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling for the State of Uttarakhand Goods and Service Tax dated 30.01.2023 (Annexure-1 to the writ petition) issued by respondent No. 3. Petitioner is a...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
COMMON ORDER The challenge in both Writ Petitions is to the orders dated 25.06.2024 passed by the respondent and to quash the portion of the order, in and by which, the respondent has confirmed the tax to the tune of Rs. 5,12,73,268/- and Rs. 5,98,02,972/- respectively and imposed equal amount of penalty under Section 74 of TNGST Act apart from demand of interest. 2. As the issue involved in both the Writ Petitions is identical in nature, with consent, the Writ Petitions are take...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER 1. Heard Sri Atul Gupta, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri Ankur Agarwal, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondents. 2. Petitioner has filed this writ petition challenging therein the Show Cause Notice No. ZD090824020702H dated 03.08.2024 issued by the Deputy Commissioner, State Tax, Sector-2 NOIDA, U.P. under Section 74 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘CGST Act’). 3. Facts of the cas...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


25
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 Apr

☑ Half-Yearly | ITC-04

ITC-04 for the half year (Oct - Mar 2025) (For taxpayers > 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

☑ Annual | ITC-04

ITC-04 for complete FY 2024-25 (For taxpayers <= 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)