^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

SURESH CHAND MEENA vs. STATE OF HARYANA
(Punjab and Haryana High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

ANOOP CHITKARA

Pet. Counsel

Ankur Lal

Res. Counsel

Rajat Gautam

Petitioner / Applicant	SURESH CHAND MEENA
Respondent	STATE OF HARYANA
Court	Punjab and Haryana High Court
State	Punjab
Date	Dec 17, 2024
Order No.	CRM-M No. 55064 of 2024
Citation	2024(12) TAXREPLY 12308
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
ANOOP CHITKARA, J. FIR No. Dated Police Station Sections 07 04.04.2024 Anti-Corruption Bureau, Faridabad 7 of PC Act (Section 13 (1) (B) read with section 13(2) of PC Act and 201 IPC, 1860 added later on) 1. The petitioner incarcerated in the FIR captioned above had come up before this Court under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, [BNSS], seeking regular bail. 2. In paragraph 15 of the bail petition, the accused declares that he has no criminal antecedents. 3. The facts and allegations are being taken from the reply filed by the State, which reads as follows: “3. That, the factual background of the case of the prosecution is that one Surender Kumar appeared in the office of the Anti Corruption Bureau, Faridabad and produced a complaint agai....