Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  13,161 Results

SHEETAL TYAGI


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Uttar Pradesh | Jan 25, 2019)

Mr. Sheetal Tyagi, Flat No. 140 Saraswati Tower, Mahagun  Puram; NH-24, Meherauli Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, 201002 (hereinafter called the applicant) is an unregistered person under GST having TRN : 091800001064ART. 2. The Applicant is service recipient of third party maintenance services. 3. The Applicant has submitted application for Advance Ruling dated 31-10-2018 enclosing duly filled Form ARA-01 (the application form for Advance Ruling) along with annexure and atta...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

GENERAL MILLS INDIA PVT. LTD.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Uttar Pradesh | Jan 25, 2019)

M/s. General Mills India Pvt. Ltd., 121 Brindaban Garden, Sahibabad, Ghaziabad Uttar Pradesh, 201005 (hereinafter called the applicant) is a registered assessee under GST having GSTN : 09AAACG1773B1ZY. 2. The applicant is engaged in the manufacture and sale of various types of food products including Atta, Wheat flour, Meslin flour, Maida, Cake mixes, Ready to eat products, etc. The key brands of General Mills include Pillsbury, Betty Crocker, Parampara. Haagen Dazs, etc, 3.&emsp...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
In this batch of writ petitions the petitioners have laid challenge, amongst others, on the ground that Section 174 of the KSGST Act is ultra vires of the State's legislative power or on the ground that the demand is barred by limitation under Section 25(1) of the KVAT Act. In some cases, both the grounds have been taken. 2. All counsel agree that the issues stand squarely covered against the petitioners by judgment dated 11th January, 2019 in W.P(C) No.11335 of 2018 and connected cas...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

TOPLAND ENGINES PRIVATE LIMITED vs. UNION OF INDIA


(Gujarat High Court | Jan 24, 2019)

1. Mr. Hardik Modh, learned advocate for the petitioner has invited the attention of the court to the order dated 18.9.2018 passed by a coordinate bench in Special Civil Application No.14155 of 2018, wherein in a similar set of facts, this court has issued notice and granted interim relief. 2. In the aforesaid premises, Issue Notice returnable on 13th February, 2019. By way of ad-interim relief, the respondents are restrained from making any coercive recovery pursuant to the imp...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
In this batch of writ petitions the petitioners have laid challenge, amongst others, on the ground that Section 174 of the KSGST Act is ultra vires of the State's legislative power or on the ground that the demand is barred by limitation under Section 25(1) of the KVAT Act.  In some cases, both the grounds have been taken. 2. All counsel agree that the issues stand squarely covered against the petitioners by judgment dated 11th January 2019 in W.P.(C) No.11335 of 2018 and connect...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petitioner, an assessee under the GST Act, with its factories outside Kerala, manufactures and sells confectioneries to various dealers. The petitioner's goods and vehicles were detained by the Assistant State Tax Officer for the alleged wrong declaration in the e-way bill. Aggrieved, the petitioner has filed these writ petitions. 2. The learned Division Bench of this Court in Renji Lal Damodaran v. State Tax Officer Judgment dated 06.08.2018 in W.A. No.1640 of 2018 has ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SHRI KUNJ BIHARI INDUSTRIES LLP vs. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER


(Punjab and Haryana High Court | Jan 24, 2019)

This order shall dispose of Civil Writ Petitions Nos. 24287 & 24291 of 2018, as according to the learned counsel for the parties, the issue involved therein is identical. However, the facts are being extracted from CWP No. 24287 of 2018. 2. Petitioner has approached this Court under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of Mandamus, for directing the respondents to issue CENVAT refund amounting to ₹ 7,13,975/- due to the petitioner upto 30th June, 2017. ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
In this batch of writ petitions the petitioners have laid challenge, amongst others, on the ground that Section 174 of the KSGST Act is ultra vires of the State's legislative power or on the ground that the demand is barred by limitation under Section 25(1) of the KVAT Act. In some cases, both the grounds have been taken. 2. All counsel agree that the issues stand squarely covered against the petitioners by judgment dated 11th January 2019 in W.P.(C) No.11335 of 2018 and con...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER The petitioners have assailed the communication/representation dated 27.06.2018 issued by respondent No.6 inter alia seeking a direction to respondent No.6 to act on the representation of the petitioner dated 6.03.2018 at Annexure G to the writ petition and sought for other consequential reliefs. 2. The petitioners claiming to be a private limited company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, are engaged in the business of trading in imported and domestically procured plas...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
O R D E R The petitioner is claiming the following reliefs in the writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India:- (A) Writ of declaration or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to declare entry 5(b) of Schedule II to the GST Act, 2017 (enclosed as Annexure-A) as unconstitutional being violative of Article 366(29A) of the Constitution. (B) Writ of declaration or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to declare entry 5(b) of Schedule...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


15
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
20 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the m/o Apr 2025 (Monthly Taxpayer - Rule 61) - Either Compulsory taxpayer > 5 cr. or Voluntary taxpayer < 5 cr.

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5A

GSTR-5A for the m/o Apr 2025 [Return by OIDAR Service Providers - Rule 64.]

25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).