Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  13,161 Results

The petitioners inter alia have approached this Court under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the letters dated 11.06.2018 and 15.06.2018 (Annexure P-5 and P-6) respectively issued by the Deputy Commissioner, Goods and Service Tax Division, Central Savitri Complex – II, Dada Motor, G.T. Road, Ludhiana. 2. After arguing for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that he may be allowed to with...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

TVL. RK MOTORS vs. STATE TAX OFFICER


(Madras High Court | Jan 24, 2019)

ORDER Heard the learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondent. 2. Mr.A.Valivittan, DCTO (Sattur Road) Roving Squad, O/o.The Assistant Commissioner (ST) (Enforcement), Virudhunagar is present and assisted this Court today. 3. By consent of both parties, this writ petition is taken up for disposal at the stage of admission itself. 4. The writ petitioner is an authorised dealer for Bajaj Auto Limited. ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petitioner, a business concern, has sought the following reliefs: “(i) issue a writ of mandamus or direction or order to quash Exts.P5 & P6 (ii) issue writ of mandamus or direction or order to stay all further actions under KVAT Act 03 till final orders are passed (iii) to declare the provisions of clauses (d) and (e) of sub-section (2) of section 174 of the Kerala State Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (Act 20 of 2017) as unconstitutional and hence unsustainable in ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petitioner, a business concern, has sought the following reliefs: “(i) To call for the records leading to the issuance of Exhibit-P1 order and issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ or order quashing Exhibit-P1 assessment order passed for the year 2012-13; (ii) to declare that Clause (d) and (e) of Section 174 of the Kerala Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 are inconsistent and contradictory with the provisions of Section 19 of the Constitution (One Hundred ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petitioner, a business concern, has sought the following reliefs: “(i) Declare that clauses (a), (b), (c), (d) and (e) of Sub Section 2 of Section 174 of the Kerala State Goods and Services Act 2017 (Act 20 of 2017) is illegal and ultra vires Articles 246A of the Constitution of India, Section 19 of the Constitution (One Hundred and First Amendment) Act, 2016 and the Kerala State Goods and Services Act 2017 (Act 20 of 2017) and is accordingly to be rendered void and unenforceabl...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER The petitioner is a manufacturer of dried chick peas, gram flour, pulses and grams. The petitioner's claim is that they purchase chick peas, dry them by heating them to a certain degree and the resultant product is known as “Dried Chick Peas”. According to the petitioner, this would have to be classified only under Chapter 0713 of HSN. The petitioner had transported the dried chick peas from Salem to Dindigul. The petitioner had not filed any E-Way bill in view o...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Jan 23, 2019)

PROCEEDINGS (Under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act”] by Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following questions. ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

RAJIV GANDHI CENTRE FOR AQUACULTURE


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Tamilnadu | Jan 23, 2019)

M/s. Rajiv Gandhi Centre for Aquaculture [RGCA] is a society under Marine Products Export Development Authority, Ministry of Commerce & Industry, Govt. of India. It is a society registered under the Tamilnadu Societies Registration Act, 1975 and are having registered office at Door No.3/ 197, Poompuhar Road, Karaimedu Village, Sattanathapuram P.O., Nagapattinam (Dist), Sirkali Taluk -609109. RGCA has also registered itself under section 12AA of the Income-tax Act, 1961. RGCA has preferred...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

PREMIER SOLAR SYSTEMS (P) LIMITED DEHRADUN.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Uttarakhand | Jan 23, 2019)

1. This is an application under Sub-Section (1) of Section 97 of the CGST/SGST Act, 2017 (herein after referred to as Act) and the rules made thereunder filed by M/s. Premier Solar Systems (P) Limited, Buliding No-4, Edwards 25/1, Rajpur Road, Dehradun, Uttarakhand seeking an advance ruling on following issues: (a) Whether the supply of solar rooftop power plant along with design, erection, commissioning & installation is a ‘composite supply’ and the applicability of ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

TELSTRA TELECOMMUNICATION PVT. LTD


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Jan 23, 2019)

PROCEEDINGS (Under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act”] by TELSTRA TELECOMMUNICATION PVT.LTD., the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following questions :- a) Whe...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


14
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
20 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the m/o Apr 2025 (Monthly Taxpayer - Rule 61) - Either Compulsory taxpayer > 5 cr. or Voluntary taxpayer < 5 cr.

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5A

GSTR-5A for the m/o Apr 2025 [Return by OIDAR Service Providers - Rule 64.]

25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).