Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  13,161 Results

THE KREATIONS BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Jan 23, 2019)

PROCEEDINGS (Under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as the CGST “Act and “MGST Act” respectively] by M/s. THE KREATIONS BUILDERS & DEVLOPERS, seeking an advance ruling raising the following question: ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

ENVITECH CHEMICAL SPECIALITIES PRIVATE LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Jan 23, 2019)

PROCEEDINGS (Under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act”] by ENVITECH CHEMICAL SPECIALITIES PRIVATE LIMITED, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following question. 1. Whet...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

ROYAL TRANSLINES PRIVATE LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Jan 23, 2019)

PROCEEDINGS (Under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 by Royal Translines Private Limited, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following questions : 1. Whether the transaction would be classified as GTA service. 2. Applicability of Notifi...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
In this batch of writ petitions the petitioners have laid challenge, amongst others, on the ground that Section 174 of the KSGST Act is ultra vires of the State's legislative power or on the ground that the demand is barred by limitation under Section 25(1) of the KVAT Act. In some cases, both the grounds have been taken. 2. All counsel agree that the issues stand squarely covered against the petitioners by judgment dated 11th January 2019 in W.P.(C) No.11335 of 2018 and connected cas...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
In this batch of writ petitions the petitioners have laid challenge, amongst others, on the ground that Section 174 of the KSGST Act is ultra vires of the State's legislative power or on the ground that the demand is barred by limitation under Section 25(1) of the KVAT Act. In some cases, both the grounds have been taken. 2. All counsel agree that the issues stand squarely covered against the petitioners by judgment dated 11th January 2019 in W.P.(C) No.11335 of 2018 and connected cas...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
In this batch of writ petitions the petitioners have laid challenge, amongst others, on the ground that Section 174 of the KSGST Act is ultra vires of the State's legislative power or on the ground that the demand is barred by limitation under Section 25(1) of the KVAT Act.  In some cases, both the grounds have been taken. 2. All counsel agree that the issues stand squarely covered against the petitioners by judgment dated 11th January 2019 in W.P.(C) No.11335 of 2018 and connect...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. Heard Mr. A. S. Mishra, learned advocate for the petitioner. 2. From the facts as emerging from the record, it appears that provisional attachment of the bank accounts of the petitioner has been made under section 83 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, however, no copy of any order under section 83 of the said Act appears to have been served upon the petitioner. The order of provisional attachment of property under section 83 issued to the concerned bank is in Form DRC-22 ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
In this batch of writ petitions the petitioners have laid challenge, amongst others, on the ground that Section 174 of the KSGST Act is ultra vires of the State's legislative power or on the ground that the demand is barred by limitation under Section 25(1) of the KVAT Act. In some cases, both the grounds have been taken. 2. All counsel agree that the issues stand squarely covered against the petitioners by judgment dated 11th January 2019 in W.P.(C) No.11335 of 2018 and con...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

ODYSSEY TOUR AND TRAVELS PVT LTD.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Goa | Jan 22, 2019)

This application was filed by the applicant M/s. Odyssey Tours & Travels Pvt. Ltd. for an advance ruling under section 97 of the Goa Good and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Central Goods and Services Tax, Act 2017 (hereinafter referred to as Act). Through this application, the applicant has informed that they had paid GST correctly but had not distributed the tax amounts correctly over the different States and Union Territories in last 13 months. To rectify their mistakes, they were a...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

ALCON RESORT HOLDINGS PRIVATE LTD.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Goa | Jan 22, 2019)

The present advance ruling application has been filed by M/s. Alcon Resort Holdings Private Ltd. under section 97 of the Goa Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Central Goods and Services Tax, Act 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) seeking an Advance Ruling in respect of the following question: “Whether the service provided by the applicant (including all incidental services) amounts to a composite service under the classification of health care services exempted under E...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


14
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
20 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the m/o Apr 2025 (Monthly Taxpayer - Rule 61) - Either Compulsory taxpayer > 5 cr. or Voluntary taxpayer < 5 cr.

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5A

GSTR-5A for the m/o Apr 2025 [Return by OIDAR Service Providers - Rule 64.]

25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).