Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  13,161 Results

PALAK DESIGNER DIAMOND JEWLLERY vs. UNION OF INDIA


(Gujarat High Court | Jan 29, 2019)

1. Rule. Mr. Nirzar Desai, learned Senior Standing Counsel waives service of notice of rule on behalf of the respondent. 2. By this petition, the petitioner has challenged the validity of the seizure orders dated 11/12.1.2018 and 14/15.3.2018 and seeks a direction to the respondent to forthwith allow provisional release of the goods seized under the seizure memos dated 11/12.1.2018 and 14/15.3.2018. 3. At the outset, Mr. Hardik Modh, learned advocate for the petitioner submits that he...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

TECHNIP UK LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Jan 29, 2019)

The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as "the CGST Act and MGST Act"] by M/s. Technip UK Limited, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following questions. (a) Whether the terms of the NIT, in particular its self-styled description as 'lump sum turnkey' contract, renders it as a 'works contract as understood under the ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER Challenging the validity of the Government Order passed by the 1st respondent in G.O.Ms.No.296 Finance (Salaries) Department dated 09.10.2017 and the consequential impugned order passed by the 2nd respondent in Letter No.F.Circular/ SDO IV/Com/2017 dated 13.11.2017 and the consequential impugned order passed by the 3rd respondent in Lr.No.F.81171/Audit/SDO I/COM/2017 dated 19.12.2017 in so far as the work awarded to the petitioner namely providing improvements to water supply distri...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

STORM COMMUNICATIONS PRIVATE LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, West Bengal | Jan 28, 2019)

1. The Applicant, stated to be a supplier of Event Management Services in West Bengal and other states, seeks a Ruling on the following points: a. Can a person, registered in WB, claim ITC for CGST and SGST of other states, b. Can he adjust the ITC of one state’s CGST for payment of another state’s CGST, c. Can he adjust the ITC of Tamil Nadu GST for payment of IGST, whereas he is not registered in Tamil Nadu? Advance Ruling is admissible on this question under Sec...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

EX-SERVICEMEN RESETTLEMENT SOCIETY


(Authority for Advance Ruling, West Bengal | Jan 28, 2019)

1. The Applicant, stated to be a registered society providing Security Services and Scavenging Services to various hospitals under the State Government as well as the Central Government, seeks a ruling as to whether exemption from payment of GST is available to them in terms of Notification No 12/2017-CT(Rate) dated 28.06.2017 and WB Govt Gazette Notification-1136-FT dated 28.06.2017, as amended (hereinafter collectively referred to as “the Exemption Notification”). Advance Ru...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

NIS MANAGEMENT LTD.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, West Bengal | Jan 28, 2019)

1. The Applicant, stated to be a service provider by the deployment of personnel like a plumber, sweeper, security guard, electrician, carpenter etc. to the West Bengal Housing Board, seeks a ruling as to whether sweeping service to the said Board is exempt from payment of GST in terms of Notification No 12/2017-CT (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 and WB Govt Gazette Notification-1136-FT dated 28.06.2017 (hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Exemption Notification”). An advance rul...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

VEDIKA EXPORTS TEA PVT. LTD.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, West Bengal | Jan 28, 2019)

1. The Applicant, stated to be a contract packer of tea bags, seeks a ruling on the classification of the services provided in way of packing of tea bags and the rate of GST thereon. Advance Ruling is admissible under Section 97(2)(a) of the CGST/WBGST Act, 2017 (hereinafter collectively called the GST Act). The Applicant states that the questions raised in the Application have neither been decided by nor are pending before any authority under any provision of the GST Act. The concern...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S AVANTIKA INDUSTRIES


(Authority for Advance Ruling, West Bengal | Jan 28, 2019)

1. The Applicant, stated to be a Manufacturer of, inter alia, Springs of Iron and Steel for supply to the Railways, seeks a Ruling on the classification of these items. Advance Ruling is admissible on this question under Section 97(2)(a) of the CGST/WBGST Act, 2017 (hereinafter collectively called “the GST Act”). The Applicant submits that the question raised in the Application has neither been decided by nor is pending before any authority under any provisions of the GST ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

DINMAN POLYPACKS PVT. LTD.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, West Bengal | Jan 28, 2019)

1. The Applicant, stated to be a manufacturer of Polypropylene Leno Bags, seeks a ruling on classification of and rate of tax applicable on the above goods under the CGST/WBGST Acts, 2017 (hereinafter referred to, collectively, as “the GST Act”). Advance Ruling is admissible under Section 97(2)(a) and (e) of the GST Act. The Applicant submits that the question raised in the Application has neither been decided by nor is pending before any authority under any provisions of the ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

RUDRABHISHEK ENTERPRISES LTD.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Uttar Pradesh | Jan 25, 2019)

M/s. [Rudrabhishek Enterprises Ltd.] A-6, Sector 58, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, 201301 (hereinafter called the applicant) is a registered assessee under GST having GSTN : 1[09AAACR707L2ZD] 2. The applicant is engaged in providing all kinds of consultancy services related with infrastructure, environment, urban designing, urban planning, housing and project management, civil designing, construction management including civil, mechanical, electrical, and all other types of erection, commiss...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


15
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
20 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the m/o Apr 2025 (Monthly Taxpayer - Rule 61) - Either Compulsory taxpayer > 5 cr. or Voluntary taxpayer < 5 cr.

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5A

GSTR-5A for the m/o Apr 2025 [Return by OIDAR Service Providers - Rule 64.]

25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).