Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  13,161 Results

NEWTECH FILTER INDIA PVT. LTD.


(First Appellate Authority, Chandigarh | Jan 31, 2019)

M/s. Newtech Filter India Pvt. Ltd. Village Bairsen, Manjholi, Nalagarh, Distt. Solan, Himachal Pradesh (for brevity ‘the Appellants’) has filed the present appeal against the Sanction Order under Budgetary Support No. 34/AC/R/BS/Baddi/2017-18, dated 2-7-2018 (for brevity ‘the impugned orders’) passed by the Assistant Commissioner, Goods & Service Tax Division, Baddi (for brevity ‘the adjudicating authority’). Accordingly, I take up the appeal for decis...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. TECH MECH GLOBAL INTERFACE PVT. LTD.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Andhra Pradesh | Jan 31, 2019)

The present application has been filed by M/s. Tech Mech Global Interface Pvt. Ltd., registered under the Goods and Services Tax U/s 97 of the Central Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 and AP Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to CGST Act and APGST Act respectively) M/s. Tech Mech Global Interface Pvt. Ltd.,, (hereinafter referred to as applicant) is engaged in trading of industrial products specifically Gear box, Electrical actuator and pumps and spares. For some produ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
O R D E R Learned counsel Smt. M.R. Vanaja accepts notice for respondent No.1.   Learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for respondent Nos.4 and 7. Learned counsel Sri. K.M. Shivayogiswamy accepts notice for respondent Nos.2, 3, 5 and 6. The petitioner is before this Court seeking a direction to the respondents to permit the petitioners to correct the bonafide error which has crept in while filing the GST Tran – 1 form because of which the petitioner is d...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
O R D E R Learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for the respondents. 2. The petitioner has assailed the order passed by the respondent No.2 dated 09.01.2019 under Section 67[4] of the Karnataka Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017/Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [‘Act’ for short]. 3. The petitioner company is claiming to be a private limited company incorporated under the Companies Act, 2013 and a dealer registered under the provisions of the Act. ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for the respondents. 2. The petitioner has assailed the order passed by the respondent No.3 dated 09.01.2019 under Section 67[4] of the Karnataka Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 /Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 ['Act' for short]. 3. The petitioner company is claiming to be a private limited company incorporated under the Companies Act, 2013 and a dealer registered under the provisions of the Act. The petitioner is...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

KERALA STATE SCREENING COMMITTEE ON ANIT-PROFITEEI.. vs. S.J SPICES LTD.


(National Anti Profiteering Authority | Jan 31, 2019)

1. The present report dated 30.10.2018 has been received from the Directorate General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the case are that the Kerala State Screening Committee on Anti-profiteering, vide the minutes of its meeting held on 08.05.2018 had referred the present case to the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering, alleging profiteering by the Respondent on the sup...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

KERALA STATE SCREENING COMMITTEE ON ANTI-PROFITEER.. vs. SUDARSANS


(National Anti Profiteering Authority | Jan 31, 2019)

1. The present report dated 31.10.2018 has been received from the Directorate General of Anti-Proflteering (DGAP) after detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the case are that the Kerala State Screening Committee on Anti-profiteering, vide the minutes of its meeting held on 08.05.2018 had referred the present case to the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering, alleging profiteering by the Respondent on the sup...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

KIRAN CHIMIRALA vs. JUBILANT FOODS WORKS LTD.


(National Anti Profiteering Authority | Jan 31, 2019)

1. The brief facts of the case are that under Rule 128 of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017 an application through e-mail dated 29.11 2017 (Annexure-I of the Report) was filed by the Applicant No. 1 against the Respondent stating that he had purchased 1 SGB Stuffed GB (Garlic Bread) and 1 Med NHT Veg Extrava (Medium Veg Pizza) after paying ₹ 129/- and ₹ 440/- per item respectively vide tax Invoice No. 66065/17/66210 dated 20.10.2017 (Annexure-2 of the Report) from the ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

KAILASH CHANDRA (M/S MALI CONSTRUCTION)


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Rajasthan | Jan 31, 2019)

Note: Under Section 100 of the CGST/RGST Act, 2017, an appeal against this ruling lies before the Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling constituted under section 99 of CGST/RGST Act, 2017, within a period of 30 days from the date of service of this order. The issue raised by Mr. Kailash Chandra, (M/s. Mali Construction), situated at Mali Vas, Maandava, Mandwa, Sirohi, Rajasthan - 307001 (hereinafter called as the applicant) is fit to pronounce advance ruling as it falls under the am...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SHYAM SINGH CHAMPAWAT (M/S LAXMI MACHINERY STORE)


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Rajasthan | Jan 31, 2019)

Note: Under Section 100 of the CGST/RGST Act 2017, an appeal against this ruling lies before the Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling constituted under section 99 of CGST/RGST Act 2017, within a period of 30 days from the date of service of this order. The Issue raised by Shyam Singh Champawat, M/s. Laxmi Machinery Store, Station Road, Bhinmal, District - Jalore-343029 {hereinafter the applicant} to pronounce advance ruling falls under ambit of the Section 97(2) (a) and it is given...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


15
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
20 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the m/o Apr 2025 (Monthly Taxpayer - Rule 61) - Either Compulsory taxpayer > 5 cr. or Voluntary taxpayer < 5 cr.

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5A

GSTR-5A for the m/o Apr 2025 [Return by OIDAR Service Providers - Rule 64.]

25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).