Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  13,161 Results

KAILASH CHANDRA (M/S. MALI CONSTRUCTION)


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Rajasthan | Jan 31, 2019)

Note: Under Section 100 of the CGST/RGST Act, 2017, an appeal against this ruling lies before the Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling constituted under section 99 of CGST/RGST Act, 2017, within a period of 30 days from the date of service of this order. The issue raised by Mr. Kailash Chandra, (M/s. Mali Construction), situated at Mali Vas, Maandava, Mandwa, Sirohi, Rajasthan - 307001 (hereinafter the applicant) is fit to pronounce advance ruling as it falls under the ambit of the Sect...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. SEALWEL CORPORATION PRIVATE LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Andhra Pradesh | Jan 30, 2019)

(Under sub-section (4) of Section 98 of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and sub- section (4) of Section 98 of Andhra Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) 1. The present application has been filed U/s 97 of the Central Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 and AP Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to CGST Act and APSGT Act respectively) by M/s Sealwel Corporation Private Limited (hereinafter referred to as applicant), registered under the Goods &a...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. SHIRDI SAI ELECTRICALS LIMITED.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Andhra Pradesh | Jan 30, 2019)

(Under sub-section (4) of Section 98 of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and sub- section (4) of Section 98 of Andhra Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) 1. The present application has been filed u/s 97 of the Central Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 and AP Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to CGST Act and APSGT Act respectively) by M/s Shirdi Sai Electricals Limited., (hereinafter referred to as applicant), registered under the Goods &...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. GVS PROJECTS (P) LTD.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Andhra Pradesh | Jan 30, 2019)

(Under sub-section (4) of Section 98 of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and sub-section (4) of Section 98 of Andhra Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) 1. The present application has been filed u/s 97 of the Central Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 and AP Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to CGST Act and APGST Act respectively) by M/s. GVS Projects Private Limited.,(hereinafter referred to as applicant), registered under the Goods & Service...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

PHILODEN INDUSTRIES PVT LTD. vs. UNION OF INDIA


(Gujarat High Court | Jan 30, 2019)

1. Pursuant to the order dated 29.1.2019, the petitioner has made applications for allowing the credit of central excise and VAT under the FORM-GST TRAN-1 to both the authorities, namely, the State Tax Authorities as well as the Central Tax Authorities. However, upon hearing Mr. Nirzar Desai, learned senior standing counsel for the respondents No.3 and 4 and Mr. Utkarsh Sharma, learned Assistant Government Pleader for the newly added respondents No.6 and 7, it appears that there is a dispute ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Heard learned counsel for the parties. By way of this writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the circular dated 17.08.2017 (Annexure-1) issued by the State Government whereby the persons who are dealing with HSD has been directed to pay GST. The issue was before different High Courts, more particularly, learned counsel for the petitioner has relied upon the decision of Punjab and Haryana High Court in the case of Carpo Power Limited –v- State of Haryana and Ors., which wa...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

NHPC LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Uttarakhand | Jan 30, 2019)

1. This is an application under Sub-Section (1) of Section 97 of the CGST/SGST Act, 2017 (herein after referred to as Act) and the rules made thereunder filed by M/s NHPC, Admin Building, Tanakpur Power Station, Banbasa, Uttrakhand seeking an advance ruling on the issue: (a) Whether the Notification No. 12/2017-Centra1 Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 (as amended from time to time) is applicable to the contractors/ sub- contractors involved in the construction of Indo-Nepal Border Road or othe...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

GOODWEAR FASHION PVT. LTD. SIDCUL PANTNAGAR.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Uttarakhand | Jan 30, 2019)

1. This is an application under Sub-Section (1) of Section 97 of the CGST/SGST Act, 2017 (herein after to be referred as “Act”) and the rules made thereunder filed by M/s. Goodswear Fashion Pvt. Ltd., Plot No. 42, Sector-6, IIE, SIDCUL, Pant Nagar, Rudrapur, Distt. Udham Sing Nagar, Uttarakhand - 263153, seeking an advance ruling on the question : “Whether Interlining Fabrics is classified under HSN Code 5903 or should be classified as per the blend of Yam (in chapt...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAX (T & R) , HO.. vs. RLJ WOVEN SACKS PVT. LTD.


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, West Bengal | Jan 30, 2019)

An Appeal filed under Section 100(1) of the West Bengal Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017/ Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, by the Assistant Commissioner of Central Tax, Howrah CGST & CX Commissionerate. Present for the Appellant: Sri Dipankar Mukherjee, Superintendent (T&R), Central Tax, Howrah CGST & CX Commissionerate Present for the Respondent: Sri Vinay Kumar Shraff, Advocate This Appeal has been filed by the Assistant Commissioner of Central Tax, Howrah C...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

PHILODEN INDUSTRIES PVT LTD. vs. UNION OF INDIA


(Gujarat High Court | Jan 29, 2019)

1. Learned advocate for the petitioner has tendered draft amendment. The amendment is allowed in terms of the draft. The same shall be carried out forthwith. 2. In the light of the averments made in the affidavit-inreply filed on behalf of the respondent Nos. 1, 3 and 4, wherein it has been stated that the petitioner is allocated to the State Tax Authorities under the GST regime and that despite the fact that the petitioner falls under the jurisdiction of the State Tax Authorities, the No...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


15
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
20 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the m/o Apr 2025 (Monthly Taxpayer - Rule 61) - Either Compulsory taxpayer > 5 cr. or Voluntary taxpayer < 5 cr.

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5A

GSTR-5A for the m/o Apr 2025 [Return by OIDAR Service Providers - Rule 64.]

25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).