Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search

  13,275 Results

1. Writ   Petition   Nos.   2638/2017,179/2019, 1138/2019, 809/2018, 385/19 and 1838/17 are Not on Board.  Upon mentioning, these petitions are taken on board as they are part of the common admission order. 2. These petitions have already been expedited by the order dated 7th June, 2019. These petitions to come up in the normal course. However, liberty to the parties to apply. 3. Petitioner in Writ Petition (L) No. 7651 of 2019 is directed to re...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. Mr. A. R. Madhav Rao, learned advocate with Mr. Maulik Nanavati and Mr. Mihir Gupta, learned advocates for the petitioner invited the attention of the court to an order dated 9th February, 2018 passed by this court in Special Civil Application No.726 of 2018, wherein the court has passed the order in the following terms: “The petitioner has challenged vires of Notification No. 8/2017-Integrated Tax [Rate] dated 28th June 2017 and Entry 10 of the Notification No. 10/2017- Integrat...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SANJAY KUMAR JAIN


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Rajasthan | Jul 2, 2019)

Note: Under Section 100 of the CGST/RGST Act, 2017, an appeal against this ruling lies before the Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling constituted under section 99 of CGST/RGST Act, 2017, within a period of 30 days from the date of service of this order. At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the CGST Act and the RGST Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to such dissimilar provisions, a re...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petitioner challenges Ext.P4 series notices issued by the 1st respondent as illegal and without jurisdiction. Ext.P4(c) is an order of detention made under Section 129 (1) of CGST Act, 2017 and Ext.P4 (d) is a notice issued under Section 129 (3) of the Act. The petitioner contends that the subject matter of Exts. P4(c) and P4(d) is fully compliant with all the requirements of the Act and the petitioner was in a position to demonstrate within the time given by the authorities that Part B/E...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

PERFECT BORING PRIVATE LIMITED vs. UNION OF INDIA


(Gujarat High Court | Jun 28, 2019)

1. Leave to amend the relief clause. 2. Rule. Mr. Ankit Shah, learned Senior Standing Counsel, waives service of notice of rule on behalf of the respondents. 3. By this application, the applicant seeks extension of the time period for furnishing bank guarantee as directed vide order dated 08.02.2019 for a further period of four months from today for the reasons set out in the memorandum of application. 4. Heard Mr. Zubin Bharda, learned advocate for the applicant and Mr. Ankit Sha...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. A Report dated 30.10.2018 was furnished by the Applicant No. 2 i.e. the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) to this Authority, after detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts mentioned in the above Report were that the Haryana State Screening Committee on Anti-Profiteering, vide the minutes of its meeting held on 20.06.2018 had forwarded an application dated 08.04.2018 filed by the Applicant No. 1 to the St...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

DIRECTOR GENERAL OF ANTI-PROFITEERING, INDIRECT TA.. vs. VATIKA LTD.


(National Anti Profiteering Authority | Jun 28, 2019)

1. The present Report dated 25.02.2019 has been received from the Applicant No. 3 i.e. the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after detailed investigation under Rule 129(6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the present case are that the Haryana State Screening Committee on Anti-Profiteering, vide the minutes of its meeting held on 20.06.2018 had forwarded an application dated 08.05.2018 filed by the Applicant No. 1 to the Standing Committe...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

TUI INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Delhi | Jun 28, 2019)

1. The applicant, M/s. TUI India Private Limited is mainly engaged in the business of outbound tours. The applicant Specializes in package tours, air tickets. rail tickets, accommodation, transport, visa and tailor made holidays for tourists visiting overseas and within India. The applicant provides a combination of these services or single services, as per the client’s requirement. It provides services to both B2B and B2C clients. Question No. 1: 'Accommodation Only' servic...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

INDIAN INSTITUTE OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Delhi | Jun 28, 2019)

I. The Indian Institute of Corporate Affairs ("IICA"), the applicant, is a society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860. The applicant has the following registrations and exemptions available: (i) An exemption under Section 10 (23C) (iv) and (v) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for AY 2017-18 onwards. (ii) Registration under Section 12A/12AA of the Income Tax Act, 1961 vide registration no. 12A/2009-10/1-1290/593 dated 19.08.2009. 2. The applicant is primaril...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petitioner by filing this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has made the following prayer: “ a) For issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing of the order dated 6.11.2018 passed by the respondent no.3 being illegal and without jurisdiction in terms of Section 73(1) of the Bihar Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the Act for short); b) For issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the responden...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


22
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).