Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search

  13,275 Results

1. RULE returnable forthwith. Mr.Parth Bhatt, the learned counsel waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondents. 2. By this writ-application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ-applicant has prayed for the following reliefs : “A. Your Lordships may be pleased to admit this petition; B. Your Lordships may be pleased to allow this petition; C. Your Lordships may be pleased to issue writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The appellant, M/s.The Indian Hume Pipe Co., Ltd., has filed this intra Court appeal, aggrived by the order of the learned Single Judge dated 28.01.2019, by which the learned Single Judge refused to interfere with the G.O.No.Ms.No.296, Finance (Salaries) Department, dated 09.10.2017, issued by the Finance Department of the Government of Tamil Nadu, making certain clarifications and procedural requirements about implementation of the new GST regime. The observations made by the learned Single ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Heard Mr. D. V. Pathy, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr. Alok Kumar Agrawal, learned counsel appearing for the respondent authorities in the Central Goods and Services Tax Division, Office of the Central Excise Bihar, Patna i.e. respondent no. 3 to 5. Learned counsel for the Union of India and the State are also present. Even though the petitioner complains of discriminatory action by the respondent no. 3 and 4 in not extending the benefit of Notification No. 31 of 2018...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

GUJARAT STATE FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Gujrat | Jun 27, 2019)

1. The Applicant M/s. Gujarat State Financial Services ltd (GSFS) is a wholly owned subsidiary of Government of Gujarat has 100% holding and is registered with RBI as a Non-Banking Finance Company. It has been given the mandate by the State Government to manage the surplus funds of various state owned entities. The State Government has directed all the State Government owned entities to park all their surplus funds with GSFS i.e applicant. The funds received by GSFS from the Government entiti...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

ARIHANT DREDGING DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, West Bengal | Jun 27, 2019)

Preamble Applicant’s representative heard: Sri Sumit Nishania, CA A person within the ambit of Section 100 (1) of the Central Goods and Services Act, 2017 or West Bengal Goods and Services Act, 2017 (hereinafter collectively called ‘the GST Act’), if aggrieved by this Ruling, may appeal against it before the West Bengal Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, constituted under Section 99 of the West Bengal Goods and Services Act, 2017, within a period of thirty days ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

DREDGING AND DESILTATION COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, West Bengal | Jun 27, 2019)

Preamble A person within the ambit of Section 100 (1) of the Central Goods and Services Act, 2017 or West Bengal Goods and Services Act, 2017 (hereinafter collectively called ‘the GST Act’), if aggrieved by this Ruling, may appeal against it before the West Bengal Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, constituted under Section 99 of the West Bengal Goods and Services Act, 2017, within a period of thirty days from the date of communication of this Ruling, or within such furth...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

BORBHETA ESTATE PVT. LTD.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, West Bengal | Jun 27, 2019)

Preamble A person within the ambit of Section 100 (1) of the Central Goods and Services Act, 2017 or West Bengal Goods and Services Act, 2017 (hereinafter collectively called ‘the GST Act’), if aggrieved by  this Ruling, may appeal against it before the West Bengal Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling,  constituted under Section 99 of the West Bengal Goods and Services Act, 2017, within a period of thirty days from the date of communication of this Ruling, or withi...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

TIME TECH WASTE SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, West Bengal | Jun 27, 2019)

Preamble A person within the ambit of Section 100 (1) of the Central Goods and Services Act, 2017 or West Bengal Goods and Services Act, 2017 (hereinafter collectively called ‘the GST Act’), if aggrieved by this Ruling, may appeal against it before the West Bengal Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, constituted under Section 99 of the West Bengal Goods and Services Act, 2017, within a period of thirty days from the date of communication of this Ruling, or within such furth...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SRI KRISHNA TRADERS vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Jun 26, 2019)

Let notice be issued to the respondents, returnable on 24th July 2019. Ms.Mehta, the learned AGP waives service of notice for and on behalf of the respondents – State. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and having gone through the materials on record, we propose to pass an interim order with regard to the release of the goods seized by the officers of the Goods and Services Tax department. It appears from the materials on record that the writapplicant her...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

JAI JAWAN JAI KISAN SUPPLIERS vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Jun 26, 2019)

Let notice be issued to the respondents, returnable on 24th July 2019. Ms.Mehta, the learned AGP waives service of notice for and on behalf of the respondents – State. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and having gone through the materials on record, we propose to pass an interim order with regard to the release of the goods seized by the officers of the Goods and Services Tax department. It appears from the materials on record that the writ applicant he...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


21
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).