Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search

  13,275 Results

M/S. SOUTHERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF AP LTD..


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Andhra Pradesh | Jul 8, 2019)

ORDER (Under sub-section (4) of section 98 of Central Goods And Service Tax Act, 2017 and under sub- section (4) of Section 98 of Andhra Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) 1. The present application has been filed under Section  97 of the Central Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 and Andhra Pradesh Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to CGST Act and APGST Act respectively) by M/s. Southern Power Distribution Company of AP Ltd., (Corporate Office)...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S CHITRA TRANSPORT


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Andhra Pradesh | Jul 8, 2019)

ORDER (under sub-section (4) of section 98 of Central Goods And Service Tax Act, 2017 and under sub- section (4) of Section 98 of Andhra Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) 1. The present application has been filed under Section 97 of the Central Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 and Andhra Pradesh Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as CGST Act and APGST Act respectively) by Shri. Balasubramanyam Saravana Perumal, Prop: M/s Chitra Transport, NH-5, ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

THE BENGAL ROWING CLUB


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, West Bengal | Jul 8, 2019)

1. This Appeal has been filed by The Bengal Rowing Club (hereinafter referred to as “the Appellant”) on 29.04.2019 against Advance Ruling No. 48/WBAAR/2018-19 dated 28.03.2019, pronounced by the West Bengal Authority for Advance Ruling (hereinafter referred to as the WBAAR) in the matter of The Bengal Rowing Club. 2. The Bengal Rowing Club located at 13/2 Baroj Road, Rabindra Sarobar, Kolkata- 700 029, holding GSTIN 19AABCT1321M1ZC, stated to be a non-profit making compan...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. INDO AUTOTECH LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Rajasthan | Jul 8, 2019)

Note: Under Section 100 of the CGST/RGST Act, 2017, an appeal against this ruling lies before the Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling constituted under section 99 of CGST/RGST Act, 2017, within a period of 30 days from the date of service of this order. At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the CGST Act and the RGST Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to such dissimilar provisions, a re...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. INDO AUTOTECH LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Rajasthan | Jul 8, 2019)

Note: Under Section 100 of the CGST/RGST Act, 2017, an appeal against this ruling lies before the Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling constituted under section 99 of CGST/RGST Act, 2017, within a period of 30 days from the date of service of this order. At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the CGST Act and the RGST Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to such dissimilar provisions, a re...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned counsel representing the State as well as learned Assistant Solicitor General representing the Union of India. All these writ applications are raising a common question as to the effect of coming into force of the Goods and Services Tax Act (hereinafter referred to as the “GST Act, 2017”) in respect of the tenders which were floated prior to coming into force of the Act of 2017 and in respect thereof the agreement i.e. the Sta...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

PIYA VIKRAM RAJAI vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Jul 4, 2019)

1. Mr. Uchit Sheth, learned advocate for the petitioner has invited the attention of the court to the order dated 27.3.2019 passed by this court in Special Civil Application No.6118 of 2019 and order dated 26.6.2019 passed by this court in Special Civil Application No.11007 of 2019. 2. In view of the above orders as well as considering the submissions advanced by the learned advocate for the petitioner, Issue Notice returnable on 24th July, 2019. 3. Considering the fact that the suppl...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Parties through their counsel. The petitioner before this Court has filed the present petition alleging inaction on the part of the respondents in accepting TRAN-1. 2. The petitioner's contention is that there was some technical fault in the website and, therefore, the petitioner was not able to fill and upload TRAN-1. Though a detailed and exhaustive return has been filed in the matter, however, Shri Prasanna Prasad has brought notice of this Court that a Nodal Officer has b...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. The brief facts of the case are that an application dated 15.02.2019 was filed before the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering, under Rule 128 of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017 by the Applicant No. 1 alleging profiteering by the Respondent in respect of “HP V202b 19.5 inch Computer Monitor” (hereinafter referred to as the product) supplied by him. The Applicant No. 1 alleged that the Respondent had maintained the same selling price of ₹ 6,869/- for t...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

UNION OF INDIA vs. SAPNA JAIN & ORS.


(Supreme Court | Jul 3, 2019)

ORDER I.A.No.93194/2019 in SLP(Crl.)No.6922/2018 : Upon hearing learned counsel for the applicant- petitioner, we direct that the orders of the High Court dated 6.6.2019 and 25.6.2019, in so far as custody of the accused-petitioner, Mohammed Farooq Mohd. Hanif Shaikh, is concerned, shall continue until further orders. Accordingly, application stands disposed of. ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


22
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).