Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search

  13,275 Results

M/S. ROBO SILICON PVT LTD.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Andhra Pradesh | Jul 11, 2019)

ORDER (Under sub-section (4) of section 98 of Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 and under sub- section (4) of Section 98 of Andhra Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) 1. The present application has been filed u/s 97 of the Central Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 and AP Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as CGST Act and APGST Act respectively) by M/S Robo Silicon Pvt Ltd, (hereinafter referred to as applicant), registered under the Goods & Se...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SHIVA WRITING COMPANY PVT. LTD.


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, West Bengal | Jul 11, 2019)

An Appeal filed under Section 100(1) of the West Bengal Goods and Services Tax Act. 2017/Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, by M/s. Shiva Writing Company Pvt Ltd. S K. Industrial Plaza, Sankaripota Road, Kalagachia, Thakurpukur. Kolkata-700063 against the Ruling passed by the West Bengal Advance Ruling Authority vide Order No. 44/WBAAR/2018-19 dated 13.03.2019 1. This Appeal has been filed by M/s. Shiva Writing Company Pvt. Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “the Appellant...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. By this writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicants have prayed for the following reliefs:- 4 (a) To issue writ of mandamus and/or any other appropriate writ(s) for directions to the respondents for providing appropriate compensation as well as interest, for delay in the granting of refund under the provisions of section 54 read with Section 56 of the CGST Act, Rule 91, Rule 94 and Rule 96 of the CGST Rules, 2017; (b) To issue order(s), dire...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SARAF NATURAL STONE vs. UNION OF INDIA


(Gujarat High Court | Jul 10, 2019)

1. By this writapplication under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writapplicants have prayed for the following reliefs:- 4(a) To issue writ of mandamus and/or any other appropriate writ(s) for directions to the Respondents for providing appropriate compensation as well as interest, for delay in the granting of refund; (b) To issue order(s), direction(s), writ(s) or any other relief(s) as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the cas...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. Rule returnable forthwith. Ms. Maithili Mehta, the learned Assistant Government Pleader, waives service of notice of Rule for and on behalf of the respondents nos. 2,3 and 4. 2. The respondent no. 1, although served with the notice issued by this Court, yet has chosen not to remain present before this Court either in, person or through an advocate and oppose this writ application. 3. By this writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant has pra...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

GRASIM INDUSTRIES LIMITED vs. UNION OF INDIA


(Gujarat High Court | Jul 10, 2019)

1 The subject matter of challenge in this writ application is to the constitutional validity of the amendment brought about in Section 140 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 by way of the Central Goods and Services Tax (Amendment) Act, 2018 with effect from the 1st day of July, 2017. The unamended Section 140 of the Act reads as under: “Section 140 : Transitional Arrangements for Input Tax Credit. (1) A registered person, other than a person opting to pay tax under...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1] This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenges the action of the respondents in encashing 8 bank guarantees on 29th March 2019 aggregating to ₹ 4.72 crores. This encashment of bank guarantee was done consequent to the order dated 26th March 2019 of the Appellate Authority under Section 21 of Integrated Goods and Service Tax Act read with Section 107 of the Maharashtra Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017. 2] The grievance of the petitioner is that the order dated ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenges the order dated 6th August, 2018 passed by the Maharashtra Appellate Advance Ruling Authority (AARA) under Section 101 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 and Maharashtra Goods and Service Tax act, 2017 (GST Act). By the impugned order dated 6th August, 2018, the AARA ruled that input tax credit is not available on purchase of motor vehicles to carry cash. 2. In fact, the petitioner had sought an advance...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. MALLELLI VENKATESWARA RAO


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Andhra Pradesh | Jul 9, 2019)

ORDER (Under sub-section (4) of Section 98 of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and sub- section (4) of Section 98 of Andhra Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) 1. The present application has been filed u/s 97 of the Central Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 and AP Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as CGST Act and APGST Act respectively) by M/s. Mallelli Venkateswara Rao, (hereinafter referred to as applicant), registered under the Goods &a...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The appellant is the petitioner in the writ petition, W.P. (C) No.16894 of 2019. The writ petition was dismissed by leaving liberty to the appellant to approach the appellate authority. This appeal is filed on raising contention that the subject matter involves a legal question which need to have decided by this Court, which the appellate authority may not be in a position to adjudicate upon. 2. Challenge in the writ petition was against Ext.P6 order passed by the 2nd respondent, under Se...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


22
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).