Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search

  13,275 Results

1.00. RULE, returnable forthwith. Ms.Maithili Mehta, learned AGP waived service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondent. 2.00. By this writ application, the writ applicant, a partnership firm has prayed for the following main reliefs:- 19(A). YOUR LORDSHIPS be pleased to issue writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to the respondent authority to pass order in FORM GST-PMT-03 in terms of provision of Rule 86(4) of the Central Goods and Ser...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

NAYARA ENERGY LTD. vs. UNION OF INDIA


(Gujarat High Court | Jun 26, 2019)

1. The writ-applicant is a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956. The writ-applicant seeks to challenge the legality and validity of the show-cause notice, purported to have been issued by the Dy. Commissioner of State Tax, Petroleum 1 and 2, Ahmedabad, in exercise of his powers under Section 74(1) of the Gujarat Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, and Section 74(1) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. 2. The principal argument canvassed by the learned senior counse...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SHAHIL TRADERS vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Jun 26, 2019)

Let notice be issued to the respondents, returnable on 24th July 2019. Ms.Mehta, the learned AGP waives service of notice for and on behalf of the respondents – State. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties and having gone through the materials on record, we propose to pass an interim order with regard to the release of the goods seized by the officers of the Goods and Services Tax department. It appears from the materials on record that the writ applicant he...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. The brief facts of the case are that under Rule 128 of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017, the Applicant No. 1 vide his letter dated 03.08.2018, addressed to the Member (Budget),Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC), informed that the prices of “Sanitary Napkins” hereinafter referred to as “the product” were not reduced by the Respondent No. 1 and Respondent No. 2, despite reduction in the rate of GST on the said product from 12% to N...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

DIRECTOR GENERAL OF ANTI-PROFITEERING, INDIRECT TA.. vs. ADARSH MARBLES


(National Anti Profiteering Authority | Jun 26, 2019)

1. This report, dated 05.12.2018, has been received by this Authority from the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods and Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The facts of the present case are that an application dated 22.02.2018 was filed by the Applicant No. 1 before the Uttar Pradesh State Screening Committee on Anti-profiteering constituted under Rule 128 of the above Rules alleging that the Respondent had not passed on the benefit of reduction in ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
. The brief facts of the case are that under Rule 128 of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017, an application was filed by the Applicant No. 1 alleging profiteering in respect of supply of “Sanitary Napkins” (hereinafter referred to as the product) by the Respondent. 2. The application was examined by the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering in its meeting held on 06.09.2018, and it was decided, to refer the matter to the Director General of Anti-Profiteeri...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

INDO THAI SECURITIES LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Madhya Pradesh | Jun 25, 2019)

PROCEEDINGS (Under sub-section (4) of Section 98 of Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 and the Madhya Pradesh Goods & Service Tax Act, 2017) 1. The present application has been filed u/s 97 of the Central Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 and MP Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter also referred to CGST Act and SGST Act respectively) by M/s. INDO THAI SECURITIES LIMITED (hereinafter referred to as the Applicant), registered under the Goods & Services Tax. ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF BANK MANAGEMENT


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Jun 25, 2019)

PROCEEDINGS (Under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act”] by NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF BANK MANAGEMENT, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following question. 1...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SRI KANYAKAPARAMESHWARI OIL MILLS,


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Karnataka | Jun 25, 2019)

ORDER UNDER SUB-SECTION (4) OF SECTION 98 OF CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICES TAX ACT, 2017 AND UNDER SUB-SECTION (4) OF SECTION 98 OF KARNATAKA GOODS AND SERVICES TAX ACT, 2017 1. M/s Sri Kanyakaparameshwari Oil Mills, (called as the ‘Applicant’ hereinafter), No.14, 12th Cross, Ganesh Temple Road, Bendrenagar, Kadirenahalli, Bengaluru - 560070, having GSTIN number 29AAEFS1478A1ZA has filed an application for Advance Ruling under Section 97 of CGST Act,2017 and KGST Act, 2017 read w...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

TATA MARCOPOLO MOTORS LTD.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Karnataka | Jun 25, 2019)

ORDER UNDER SECTION 98(4) OF THE CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICES TAX ACT, 2017 AND UNDER 98(4) OF THE KARNATAKA GOODS AND SERVICES TAX ACT, 2017 1. M/s Tata Marcopolo Motors Ltd., (called as the ‘applicant’ hereinafter), having GSTIN number 29AACCT5547J1ZW, have filed an application for Advance Ruling under Section 97 of CGST Act,2017 read with Rule 104 of the CGST Rules, 2017 and under Section 97 of the KGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of the KGST Rules 2017, in FORM GST ARA-01 d...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


21
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).