Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search

  13,262 Results

GOLDEN COTTON INDUSTRIES vs. UNION OF INDIA


(Gujarat High Court | Jun 19, 2019)

1.00. By this writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant has prayed for the following main reliefs:- “14.a. Your Lordships be pleased to issue a writ mandamus or any other appropriate writ directing the respondents to immediately remove prohibition of goods prohibited under Prohibition order GST INS 03 dated 05-12-2018. The said order may kindly be quashed or set aside. b. Your Lordships be pleased to issue a writ of Mandamus or any other...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Mr.A.N.R.Jayaprathap, learned counsel on record for writ petitioner and Mr.Rajnish Pathiyil, learned Senior Panel Counsel for sole respondent, are before this Court. 2. With consent of learned counsel on both sides, main writ petition itself is taken up, heard out and is being disposed of. 3. In the light of the trajectory which the hearing has taken in the Court today, the entire matter now turns on a very narrow compass. 4. The facts in a nutshell shorn of unnecessary details an...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. ASAHI KASEI PVT. LTD.


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Jun 19, 2019)

PROCEEDINGS (under Section 101 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the CGST Act and the MGST Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to such dissimilar provisions, a reference to the CGST Act would also mean a reference to the same provisions under the MGST Act. The present appeal has be...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

JAIPUR ZILA DUGDH UTPADAK SAHAKARI SANGH LTD.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Rajasthan | Jun 19, 2019)

Note: Under Section 100 of the CGST/RGST Act, 2017, an appeal against this ruling lies before the Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling constituted under section 99 of CGST/RGST Act, 2017, within a period of 30 days from the date of service of this order. At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the CGST Act and the RGST Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to such dissimilar provisions, a re...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The writ prayers read as under: “I. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction or order, calling for records leading to Ext.P2. II. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, direction or order directing the respondent to permit the petitioner to amend the tax return - Tran 1 form as prayed. III. Issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondent to permit the petitioner to claim eligible credit of ₹ 4,58,71,210/- towards Central Tax. ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Mr.S.Murugappan, learned counsel on record for writ petitioner and Ms.Hema Muralikrishnan, learned Senior Standing Counsel on behalf of both the respondents are before this Court. 2. Counter affidavit has been filed and pleadings are complete. 3. With consent of both learned counsel, main writ petition itself is taken up and disposed of. 4. It may not be necessary to advert to the facts with elaboration details and particulars in the light of the trajectory of the hearing today. ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petitioner is before this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to quash the Endorsement No.CTO/ENF-14/Hbl/ 2019-20 dated 08.06.2019 produced at Annexure-W and for a writ of mandamus directing the respondents No.1 and 2 to release the goods covered under the Tax Invoices No.RGHUB 00074 with e-way bill No.181123091 dated 26.04.2019, and tax invoices No.RGHUB 00073 with e-way bill No.161123321680 dated 26.04.2019 respectively and also the conveyance bearing registrati...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

DIRECTOR GENERAL OF ANTI-PROFITEERING, INDIRECT T.. vs. PINKY SALES


(National Anti Profiteering Authority | Jun 16, 2019)

1. This Report, dated 02.04.2018, has been received by this Authority from the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods and Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the present case are that an application was filed before the Standing Committee on Anti-Profiteering under Rule 128 of the CGST Rules, 2017, by the Applicant No. 1, alleging that he had purchased a footwear (here-in-after referred to as the product) at a price of ₹ 699/- fro...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

WILHELMSEN MARITIME SERVICES PVT. LTD.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Jun 15, 2019)

PROCEEDINGS (Under Section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) The present application has been filed under Section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act” respectively] by M/s. WILHELMSEN MARITIME SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the follo...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

JITENDRA'S AUTO WORLD vs. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS


(Bombay High Court | Jun 14, 2019)

Mr. Rastogi, learned Counsel in support of the Petition, seeks leave to amend the Petition so as to annex the first page and other relevant pages of the minutes of the meeting held on 22nd December, 2018 of Goods and Service Tax Council (GST Council). Leave as prayed for granted. Amendment to be carried out within a period of one week from today. Amended copy to be served upon the Respondent immediately thereafter. 2. This Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challenge...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


21
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).