Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search

  13,262 Results

The learned Counsel Mr. Mishra and Mr. Arsiwala, appearing for the Petitioners, seek to withdraw their individual Petition with liberty to approach the Goods and Service Tax Council with their grievance of omitting to take accrued credit in its TRAN-1 under the CGST Act. This, it is submitted is on account of human error. This liberty is sought in terms of the order of this Court in O.E.N. India Ltd., v/s. Union of India reported in 2018 TIOL 2874 and 2018 TIOL 2892 ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petitioner prays for the following reliefs: “i) to call the records from 1st respondent leading to issuance of Ext.P6 notice and to issue a writ in the nature of certiorari or any other appropriate writ or order quashing Exhibit P6 notice issued by 1st respondent U/s.129 of the Kerala GST Act 2017; ii) to issue a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order, directing 2nd respondent to conduct proper adjudication after considering the clerical mistak...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. The present report dated 28.02.2019 and subsequent reports dated 03.04.2019, 08.04.2019 and 15.04.2019, have been received from the Applicant No. 2 i.e. The Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the case are that the Applicant No. 1 had booked Flat No. 0702, Block-F, in the Respondent’s project “Laurel Heights” situated at off Tumkur road, B...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

COPMED PHARMACEUTICALS PVT. LTD.


(First Appellate Authority, Chandigarh | Jun 13, 2019)

M/s. Copmed Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd., Industrial Area, Gondpur, Paonta Sahib, Distt. Sirmour (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Appellants’) are manufacturing Pharmaceutical products falling under HSN Code 3004. The Appellant has filed four appeals against four Refund Sanction Orders (RFD-06) (for brevity ‘the impugned orders’) passed by the Assistant Commissioner, Goods & Services Tax Division, Parwanoo (for brevity ‘the sanctioning authority’) rejectin...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Heard Sri P.S. Soman Pulladan, the petitioner's counsel and Smt. M.M. Jasmin, the learned Government Pleader for the respondents. 2. The petitioner challenges Ext.P5 order made under Section 129 of KSGST Act. Ext.P5 is an appealable order. The petitioner by furnishing Bank Guarantee has obtained release of goods intercepted and detained by the authorities under Section 129. The learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks indulgence to file appeal and work out the remedies within the four...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Mr.Muthuvenkataraman, learned counsel on record for writ petitioner is before this Court and Mr.V.Sundareswaran, learned senior panel counsel (GST), who had accepted notice on behalf of respondents 1 and 2 yesterday, is before this Court. 2. To be noted, the third respondent is Indian Overseas Bank and considering the nature of the matter, the third respondent is only in the nature of a Garnishee. Therefore, it will suffice if the order (which this Court shall now be passing in this writ ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for the respondents. 2. The petitioner has challenged the proceedings dated 06.03.2019 of the respondent No.2 in MOV-07 inter alia seeking a direction to the respondents to refund the penalty of ₹ 1,71,360/-. 3. The petitioner is the dealer and supplier of essential oils, perfumery compounds and aromatic chemicals having establishments at Kundapura Taluk, Udupi District and also at Mumbai in the State of Maharashtra, as contended...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Mr.M.A. Mudi Mannan, learned counsel on record for writ petitioner and Mr.V.Sundareswaran, learned senior panel counsel (GST), who had accepted notice on behalf of both the respondents (official respondents), are before this Court. 2. With the consent of learned counsel on both sides, the main writ petition itself is taken up, heard out and disposed of. 3.Today, in a similar matter with identical set of facts (obviously nature of business and numerical values being different), this Co...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

INDIAN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE EDUCATION AND RESEARC..


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Odisha | Jun 13, 2019)

Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Berhampur (Appellant) has filed an appeal before AAAR, Odisha on 18.03.2019 aggrieved by advance ruling no 07/ODISHA-AAR/2018-19 dated 05.02.2019 pronounced by the Odisha Authority for Advance Ruling, Bhubaneswar under Section 100 of the Odisha Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 /CGST Act, 2017. 2.0. The Appellant, holding valid registration certificate issued under the CGST Act, 2017 and OGST Act, 2017 bearing GSTIN 21AABA10...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

VIDARBHA INFOTECH PVT LTD


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Jun 13, 2019)

PROCEEDINGS (Under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act”] by VIDARBHA INFOTECH PRIVATE LIMITED, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following question. 1. Whether...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


21
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).