Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search

  13,262 Results

PARVATIYA PLYWOOD (P) LTD.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Uttarakhand | Jun 10, 2019)

ORDER This is an application under sub-section (1) of Section 97 of the CGST/SGST Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as Act) and the rules made thereunder filed by M/s. Parvatiya Udyog (P) Ltd., Kashipur Road, Ramnagar, Nainital, Uttarakhand seeking an advance ruling on following issues : (a)  applicability of GST rate and HSN/classification of wood scrap. (b)  applicability of GST rate on security forfeited by Uttarakhand Forest Corporation. (c)  refund of GST ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

DIRECTOR GENERAL ANTI-PROFITEERING, CENTRAL BOARD .. vs. BESTECH INDIA LTD.


(National Anti Profiteering Authority | Jun 10, 2019)

1. The present report dated 29.03.2019 has been received from the Directorate General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the case are that an Application was filed by the Applicant No. 1 under Rule 128 of the Central Goods and Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017 against the Respondent alleging that the Respondent had charged extra VAT, EDC (External Development Charges) and IDC (...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

IMPERIAL MOTOR STORES


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Jun 10, 2019)

PROCEEDINGS (Under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act “respectively] by M/s. IMPERIAL MOTOR STORES, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following question. 1. C...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

NAVI MUMBAI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Jun 10, 2019)

PROCEEDINGS (Under section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act”] by Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following questions. 1. Whethe...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

ARIHANT DREDGING DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, West Bengal | Jun 10, 2019)

Preamble A person within the ambit of Section 100 (1) of the Central Goods and Services Act, 2017 or West Bengal Goods and Services Act, 2017 (hereinafter collectively called ‘the GST Act’), if aggrieved by this Ruling, may appeal against it before the West Bengal Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, constituted under Section 99 of the West Bengal Goods and Services Act, 2017, within a period of thirty days from the date of communication of this Ruling, or within such furth...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

DREDGING AND DESILTATION COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, West Bengal | Jun 10, 2019)

Preamble A person within the ambit of Section 100 (1) of the Central Goods and Services Act, 2017 or West Bengal Goods and Services Act, 2017 (hereinafter collectively called 'the CST Act'), if aggrieved by this Ruling, may appeal against it before the West Bengal Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, constituted under Section 99 of the West Bengal Goods and Services Act, 2017, within a period of thirty days from the date of communication of this Ruling, or within such further t...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

NEO BUILT CORPORATION


(Authority for Advance Ruling, West Bengal | Jun 10, 2019)

Preamble A person within the ambit of Section 100 (1) of the Central Goods and Services Act, 2017 or West Bengal Goods and Services Act, 2017 (hereinafter collectively called ‘the GST Act’), if aggrieved by this Ruling, may appeal against it before the West Bengal Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, constituted under Section 99 of the West Bengal Goods and Services Act, 2017, within a period of thirty days from the date of communication of this Ruling, or within such furth...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

MOHANA GHOSH, CARRYING ON BUSINESS UNDER THE TRADE..


(Authority for Advance Ruling, West Bengal | Jun 10, 2019)

A person within the ambit of Section 100 (1) of the Central Goods and Services Act, 2017 or West Bengal Goods and Services Act, 2017 (hereinafter collectively called ‘the GST Act’), if aggrieved by this Ruling, may appeal against it before the West Bengal Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, constituted under Section 99 of the West Bengal Goods and Services Act, 2017, within a period of thirty days from the date of communication of this Ruling, or within such further time as me...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

INDRAJIT SINGH, CARRYING ON BUSINESS UNDER THE TRA..


(Authority for Advance Ruling, West Bengal | Jun 10, 2019)

A person within the ambit of Section 100 (1) of the Central Goods and Services Act, 2017 or West Bengal Goods and Services Act, 2017 (hereinafter collectively called ‘the GST Act’), if aggrieved by this Ruling, may appeal against it before the West Bengal Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, constituted under Section 99 of the West Bengal Goods and Services Act,2017, within a period of thirty days from the date of communication of this Ruling, or within such further time as men...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

JSW ENERGY LIMITED vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.


(Bombay High Court | Jun 7, 2019)

1] Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2] Rule. At the request of and with the consent of learned counsel for the parties, Rule is made returnable forthwith. 3] The challenge in this petition is to the orders dated 5 March 2018 and 2 July 2018 made by the Maharashtra Authority for Advance Ruling for Goods and Service Tax (Advance Ruling Authority) and order dated 2 July 2018 made by the Maharashtra Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling for Goods and Service Tax (Appellate Authorit...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


20
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
20 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the m/o Apr 2025 (Monthly Taxpayer - Rule 61) - Either Compulsory taxpayer > 5 cr. or Voluntary taxpayer < 5 cr.

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5A

GSTR-5A for the m/o Apr 2025 [Return by OIDAR Service Providers - Rule 64.]

25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).