Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  13,223 Results

VARDAAN TRADE LINK PVT. LTD. vs. UNION OF INDIA


(Allahabad High Court | Mar 4, 2020)

ORDER The question which arises for consideration in the facts of the instant case is whether the petitioner, Vardaan Trade Link Pvt. Ltd., has been granted the opportunity of filing G.S.T. TRAN-1 form either by reopening of the portal or manually. The learned advocate representing the Revenue submits, on instructions, that the petitioner has been allowed to file his G.S.T. TRAN-1 form during the pendency of the writ petition. As such, no further order is required to be passed and...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

AZAD SAHID KHAN vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Mar 4, 2020)

1. By this Writ Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant has prayed for the following reliefs: “(A) To admit and allow this petition. (B) To issue a writ of mandamus or a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, directing the respondents to forthwith release truck No.RJ-14-GJ-2683 along with goods which is lying at Ahmedabad since 6.7.2019 on payment of tax and penalty. (C) Pending admission, hear...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. The grievances raised and issues involved in all the six writ petitions are common, and accordingly they were heard together and are being decided conjointly. This is an application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the writ petitioners are aggrieved by the orders passed by the Directorate General of Goods and Services Tax Intelligence, Kolkata Zonal Unit [hereinafter referred to as “DGGI”], to provisionally attach the current bank accounts of the writ peti...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

RSK INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED vs. UNION OF INDIA


(Gujarat High Court | Mar 4, 2020)

1. Rule, returnable forthwith. Mr.Ankit Shah, the learned advocate waives service of Notice of rule on behalf of the respondents. 2. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs : “7(A) YOUR LORDSHIPS may be pleased to admit and allow this Petition. (B) YOUR LORDSHIPS may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the Ld. Respondents to open the onl...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. By this writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicants have prayed for the following reliefs; “(I) To issue writ of or in the nature of a mandamus or any other appropriate writ(s), direction(s) and/or pass necessary order (s) directing the Respondent(s) to allow amend or re-open GST Form-Tran 1 filed by the Petitioner on 28.08.2017 (Annex.B); (II) To issue writ of or in the nature of a mandamus or any other appropriate writ(s), direction ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

R.J. ENTERPRISE vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Mar 4, 2020)

1. Rule returnable forthwith. Mr.Soaham Joshi, the learned Assistant Government Pleader waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondents. 2. By this writ-application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ-applicant has prayed for the following reliefs: “(a) quash and set-aside the impugned order dated 24.09.18 at ANNEXURE “A” provisionally attaching the bank account No.50200021304445 held with the HDFC Bank Limited; (b) pend...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SHIVANSHI ENTERPRISE vs. UNION OF INDIA


(Gujarat High Court | Mar 4, 2020)

1. Leave to implead the GSTN Council as the respondent no.4. The cause-title be amended accordingly. 2. Rule returnable forthwith. Mr. Chitran Dave, the learned AGP waives served of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondents nos.2 and 3. 3. By this writ-application under Article226 of the Constitution of India, the writ-applicant – a Proprietory concern through its Proprietor, has prayed for the following reliefs: “7 (A) Be pleased to admit and allow the prese...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

REAL PRINCE SPINTEX PVT. LTD. vs. UNION OF INDIA


(Gujarat High Court | Mar 4, 2020)

1. Rule, returnable forthwith. Mr.Nirzar S. Desai, the learned standing counsel waives service of notice   of rule for and on behalf of the respondents. 2. By this Writ Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ-applicants have prayed for the following reliefs: “A. This Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or a writ in nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order directing the learned Respondents to forthw...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER Re.  C.A.N. 143 of 2020 C.A.N. 139 of 2020 C.A.N. 147 of 2020. The above three writ petitions are relating to similar issues, therefore the applications are taken up for hearing conjointly. The case of the petitioners is that they are contractors under the State Government and have been performing their contracts during the pre-GST period. Subsequent to coming into effect of GST, there is an issue that has arisen with regard to whether the petitioners are liable to ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petitioner herein is a proprietary concern engaged in the business of Iron and Steel and is a registered dealer on the rolls of the Hyderabad Rural STU-I, Centre Jurisdiction, Gajularamaram, Hyderabad (2nd respondent). 2. The petitioner was allotted GST No.36AAMPA4421B2ZC. 3. The petitioner purchased goods from a dealer M/s. JSW Steel Limited, Vidyanagar, Karnataka vide Tax Invoice No.19UJ2900401551 dt.11.12.2019 valued at ₹ 3,52,920.74. 4. Against the said tax invoice under...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


19
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
20 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the m/o Apr 2025 (Monthly Taxpayer - Rule 61) - Either Compulsory taxpayer > 5 cr. or Voluntary taxpayer < 5 cr.

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5A

GSTR-5A for the m/o Apr 2025 [Return by OIDAR Service Providers - Rule 64.]

25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).