Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  13,223 Results

GUJARAT STATE PETRONET LIMITED vs. UNION OF INDIA


(Gujarat High Court | Mar 5, 2020)

1. Rule returnable forthwith. Learned Standing Counsel Shri Nirzar Desai waives service of rule on behalf of the respondents. 2. By this petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs : “(a) To issue a writ of certioari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature thereof for quashing the impugned order dated 01.05.2019 passed by the respondent no.3, that erroneously rejected the appeal fil...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. METHODEX SYSTEMS PRIVATE LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Madhya Pradesh | Mar 5, 2020)

PROCEEDINGS (Under sub-section (4) of Section 98 of Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 and the Madhya Pradesh Goods & Service Tax Act, 2017) 1. The present application has been filed u/s 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter also referred to CGST Act and SGST Act respectively) by M/s METHODEX SYSTEMS PRIVATE LIMITED (hereinafter referred to as the Applicant), registered under the Goods & Services Tax. The provisions of the CGST Act and MPGST ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. MASTER MINDS


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Andhra Pradesh | Mar 5, 2020)

(Under sub-section (4) of Section 98 of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and sub- section (4) of Section 98 of Andhra Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) 1. The present application has been filed u/s 97 of the Central Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 and AP Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to CGST Act and APGST Act respectively) by M/s. Master Minds, Brodipet, Guntur (hereinafter referred to as ‘applicant’), Not registered under the Good...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. POSCO INDIA STEEL DISTRIBUTION CENTRE PVT. LT..


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Mar 5, 2020)

PROCEEDINGS (Under Section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017; The present application has been filed under Section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act” respectively] by M/s. POSCO INDIA STEEL DISTRIBUTION CENTRE PVT LTD. the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect o...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. LIBERTY TRANSLINES


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Mar 5, 2020)

PROCEEDINGS (Under Section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) The present application has been filed under Section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act” respectively] by M/s. Liberty Translines , the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following questions....
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

GAURISH SHARMA M/S G.K. ENTERPRISES


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Rajasthan | Mar 5, 2020)

Note: Under Section 100 of the CGST/ RGST Act, 2017, an appeal against this ruling lies before the Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling constituted under section 99 of CGST/ RGST Act, 2017, within a period of 30 days from the date of service of this order. • At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the CGST Act and the RGST Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to such dissimilar provisions,...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Petitioner has filed this writ petition questioning the refund rejection order dated 20.11.2019 passed in Reference No.DC(ST)STUIII/ 3/2018-19 by the respondent No.1. 2. Petitioner is an entity incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956 later replaced by the Companies Act, 2013 and engaged in manufacturing and selling of Ready-Mix Concrete. 3. Petitioner had supplied the same to certain registered persons as well as persons, who are SEZ Units, in the financial year 2017-18. According ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Heard Mr. Joseph Kodianthara, the learned Senior Advocate, who appears along with Mr. Joao Mariano Dias for the Petitioner and Ms. Priyanka Kamat, learned Standing Counsel for the Respondents. 2. The challenge in this Petition is to the communications dated 7th February, 2020 and 17th February, 2020 at Exhibit P-2 and Exhibit P-3, advising the Petitioners to deposit certain amounts towards interest which are stated to be calculated by the system as per the provisions of Section 50 of the ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. Rule, returnable forthwith. Mr. Devang Vyas, learned Assistant Solicitor General waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondent Nos.1,2 and 3. 2. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs: “(a) To issue a Writ of Mandamus and/or Writ of Certiorari and/or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, quashing and setting aside the direction issued by respondent Nos.1 and 2 dated ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petitioner is a company, registered under the Companies Act 1956, with registered office in Mumbai, dealing in Auto Mobile Tyres, Tubes, Flaps, etc. filing regular returns under the Goods and Service Tax Act and Rules framed thereunder. It has a branch run under a Carry and Forward (C & F) Agency, M/s. GNXT Power Corp, which raised tax invoice on 27.02.2020, on a customer dealer located at Kollam. True copy of the tax invoice affixed with dispatched date 02.03.2020 at 12.30 pm to be s...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


19
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
20 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the m/o Apr 2025 (Monthly Taxpayer - Rule 61) - Either Compulsory taxpayer > 5 cr. or Voluntary taxpayer < 5 cr.

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5A

GSTR-5A for the m/o Apr 2025 [Return by OIDAR Service Providers - Rule 64.]

25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).