Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  13,223 Results

HERBALIFE INTERNATIONAL INDIA PVT. LTD.


(First Appellate Authority, Jaipur | Mar 9, 2020)

This appeal has been filed under Section 107 of the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 by M/s. Herbalife International India Pvt. Ltd., holding GSTIN 08AAACH8025R1Z3 C/o. Jayem Warehousing Pvt. Ltd., E-734, Nakulpath, Lal Kothi Scheme, Near Vidhansabha and Jyoti Nagar Police Station, Jaipur-302015 (hereinafter also referred to as “the appellant”) against Order No. FORM GST MOV-09, dated 6-12-2018 (hereinafter referred to as “the impugned order”) passed by the Assistant C...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

MRF LIMITED vs. SUPERINTENDENT OF CENTRAL TAX


(Andhra Pradesh High Court | Mar 6, 2020)

1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed seeking the following relief : “It is prayed that this Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order or direction declaring - (a) that the proviso to Section 50 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 inserted by Section 100 of Finance (No.2) Act, 2019 applies retrospectively from 01.07.2017 and consequently, set aside the demand notice dated 07.02.202...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

WEWORK INDIA MANAGEMENT PRIVATE LIMITED


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Karnataka | Mar 6, 2020)

PROCEEDINGS (Under Section 101 of the CGST Act, 2017 and the KGST Act, 2017) 1. At the outset we would like to make it clear that the provisions of CGST, Act 2017 and SGST, Act 2017 are in pari materia and have the same provisions in like matter and differ from each other only on a few specific provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is particularly made to such dissimilar provisions, a reference to the CGST Act would also mean reference to the corresponding similar provisions in the ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. Being aggrieved by the order of Prohibition issued in Form GST INS 03, dated 21.12.2019 by the 1 st respondent-Deputy Assistant Commissioner (ST), Jaggaiahpet Nandigama Circle, unit, Bhavanipuram, Vijayawada, this writ petition has been preferred. 2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner has advanced solitary contention emphasizing the jurisdiction of the 1st respondent, who passed the order of Prohibition as contemplated under Section 67(2) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER 1. The present Report dated 04.09.2019 has been received from the Applicant No. 2 i.e. the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods, & Service Tax (CGST) 2017. The brief facts of the present case are that the DGAP had received a reference from the Standing Committee on Anti-Profiteering on 27.03.2019 to conduct a detailed investigation in respect of an application dated 30.07.2018. (Annexure-1) filed by the...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. DOLPHIN TECHNO WASTE MANAGEMENT PRIVATE LIMIT..


(Authority for Advance Ruling, West Bengal | Mar 6, 2020)

Preamble A person within the ambit of Section 100 (1) of the Central Goods and Services Act, 2017 or West Bengal Goods and Services Act, 2017 (hereinafter collectively called ‘the GST Act’), if aggrieved by this Ruling, may appeal against it before the West Bengal Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, constituted under Section 99 of the West Bengal Goods and Services Act, 2017, within a period of thirty days from the date of communication of this Ruling, or within such furth...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. DIPAK KANTI MAZUMDER DYNAMIC ENGINEERS


(Authority for Advance Ruling, West Bengal | Mar 6, 2020)

Preamble A person within the ambit of Section 100 (1) of the Central Goods and Services Act, 2017 or West Bengal Goods and Services Act, 2017 (hereinafter collectively called 'the GST Act'), if aggrieved by this Ruling, may appeal against it before the West Bengal Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, constituted under Section 99 of the West Bengal Goods and Services Act, 2017, within a period of thirty days from the date of communication of this Ruling, or within such further t...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SWAPNA PRINTING WORKS PRIVATE LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, West Bengal | Mar 6, 2020)

Preamble A person within the ambit of Section 100 (1) of the Central Goods and Services Act, 2017 or West Bengal Goods and Services Act, 2017 (hereinafter collectively called ‘the GST Act’), if aggrieved by this Ruling, may appeal against it before the West Bengal Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, constituted under Section 99 of the West Bengal Goods and Services Act, 2017, within a period of thirty days from the date of communication of this Ruling, or within such furth...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

NEMI CHAND vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, CGST DIVISION-B


(First Appellate Authority, Jaipur | Mar 5, 2020)

This appeal has been filed under Section 107 of the Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 by Shri Nemi Chand, (Driver/Person In-Charge), Vehicle/Conveyance No.RJ-32-GA-8579 Nimeda, Srimadhopur, Sikar C/o M/s Eureka Forbes Limited (Owner of the Goods) 7, Chakraberia Road(South), Kolkata-700025 (hereinafter also referred to as “the appellant”) against Order No.11/E-way bill/CGST Div-B/18-19/7252 dated 06.12.2018 (hereinafter referred to as “the impugned order”) passed by Assis...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

JSK SONS vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Mar 5, 2020)

1. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioners have prayed for the following reliefs : “(A) Your Lordship may be pleased to admit this petition: (B) Your Lordship may be pleased issue a writ of mandamus or any other appointment writ, order and/or directions in the nature of mandamus, quashing and setting aside the provisional order of attachment said to have been issued by Respondent No.2 for attaching the Bank Accounts, as per the Table ment...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


19
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
20 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the m/o Apr 2025 (Monthly Taxpayer - Rule 61) - Either Compulsory taxpayer > 5 cr. or Voluntary taxpayer < 5 cr.

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5A

GSTR-5A for the m/o Apr 2025 [Return by OIDAR Service Providers - Rule 64.]

25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).