Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  13,223 Results

M/S. FOM ALUMINIUM MACHINES PVT. LTD.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Karnataka | Mar 12, 2020)

ORDER UNDER SECTION 98(4) OF THE CGST ACT, 2017 & UNDER 98(4) or THE KGST ACT, 2017 1. M/s. Fom Aluminium Machines Pvt. Ltd., 3rd Phase, Peenya Industrial Area, Bangalore - 560 058, having GSTIN number 29AABCF2601E1Z5, have filed an application for Advance Ruling under Section 97 of CGST Act 2017, KGST Act 2017 read with Rule 104 of CGST Rules 2017 & KGST Rules 2017, in form GST ARA-01, discharging the fee of ₹ 5,000/- each Under the CGST Act 2017 and the KGST Act 2017. 2. T...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S KANAL ENTERPRISE vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Mar 11, 2020)

1. By this writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant, a registered partnership firm through one of its partners has prayed for the following reliefs : “(A) YOUR LORDSHIPS may be pleased to admit and allow this Petition. (B) YOUR LORDSHIPS may kindly be pleased to issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction and thereby be pleased to quash and set aside the order of provisional attachment of the stock of good...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

BRITANNIA INDUSTRIES LIMITED vs. UNION OF INDIA


(Gujarat High Court | Mar 11, 2020)

1. Rule returnable forthwith. Learned Standing Counsel Shri Ankit Shah waives service of rule on behalf of the respondents. 2. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs : A)That this Hon’ble court may be pleased to issue an appropriate a writ of mandamus or a writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India ordering and directi...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

RISHABH CHOPDA


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Mar 11, 2020)

PROCEEDINGS (Under Section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) The present application has been filed under Section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act” respectively by M/s. RISHABH CHOPDA., the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following questions. 1. Wh...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. FUTUREDENT


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Mar 11, 2020)

PROCEEDINGS (Under Section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) The present application has been filed under Section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act” respectively] by M/s. FUTUREDENT, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following questions. 1. Whethe...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. HITACHI POWER EUROPE GMBH


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Mar 11, 2020)

PROCEEDINGS (Under Section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) The present application has been filed under Section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act” respectively ] by M/s. Hitachi Power Europe GmbH, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following que...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. MOUNT FAB PACKAGING LLP


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Gujrat | Mar 11, 2020)

BRIEF FACTS The applicant is an LLP concern and manufacture BOPP (Biaxially Oriented Polypropylene) Laminated PP Woven Sacks which was used in packaging industries. They submitted process of their products in a Chart as below: POLYPROPYLENE /POLYMER RESINS ----EXTRUDER---- TAPES---- LOOMS--- UNLAMINATED FABRIC---EXTRUSION COATING(PP/LDPE) LAMINATED FABRIC---PRINTING/CUTTING/STITCHING - WEBBING -- JUMBO BAGS – QUALITY CONTROL--DISPATCH 2. They submitte...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. JAY JALARAM ENTERPRISES


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Gujrat | Mar 11, 2020)

BRIEF FACTS The applicant has submitted that they are a proprietorship concern and manufacture Pop Corn, which is sold in a sealed plastic bag bearing a registered brand name as [J.J.'s] POPCORN, under the Trade Marks Act, 1999. They submitted that their product is manufactured by using corn/maize grains. The Raw corn - grains are heated in an electric machine/oven @ 180/200 degree temperature and due to the heat so given to the grains, they turn into puffed corns/popcorns which are k...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. DEENDAYAL PORT TRUST (ERSTWHILE KANDLA PORT T..


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Gujrat | Mar 11, 2020)

BRIEF FACTS The applicant has submitted that they have been directed by the ministry of shipping to prepare a master plan comprising future projects and for utilization of land resources with the endeavour for developing port based smart city. Keeping in view the above directions and vision of the government, Deendayal Port trust is developing one of India's first Smart Industrial Port City (SIPC) within Gandhidham-Kandla-Adipur Complex as part of the Sagarmala project. SIPC Kandla ai...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

KAMBAY AROMATICS vs. UNION OF INDIA


(Gujarat High Court | Mar 11, 2020)

1. Rule returnable forthwith. Learned advocate Mr. Viral Shah waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondents No.1 and 3 and learned Assistant Government Pleader Mr. Chintan Dave waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondent No.2. 2. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs: “A. That this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate a writ of man...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


19
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
20 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the m/o Apr 2025 (Monthly Taxpayer - Rule 61) - Either Compulsory taxpayer > 5 cr. or Voluntary taxpayer < 5 cr.

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5A

GSTR-5A for the m/o Apr 2025 [Return by OIDAR Service Providers - Rule 64.]

25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).