Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  13,223 Results

SIDDHI DEVELOPERS vs. UNION OF INDIA


(Gujarat High Court | Mar 11, 2020)

1. Rule returnable forthwith. Learned advocate Mr. Ankit Shah waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondents. 2. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs: “A) Your Lordships be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any such appropriate writ order or direction directing the concerned respondents to immediately consider and allow the Transition credit to the petitioner, based on the...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

ROHAN DYES & INTERMEDIATES LTD. vs. UNION OF INDIA


(Gujarat High Court | Mar 11, 2020)

ORDER Rule returnable forthwith. Learned advocate Mr. Ankit Shah waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondents. 2. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs: “(A) Your Lordships be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any such appropriate writ order or direction directing the concerned respondents to immediately consider and allow the Transition credit to the petitioner, base...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SIDDHBALI STONE GALLERY vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Mar 11, 2020)

1. Rule, returnable forthwith. Mr.Soaham Joshi, the learned Assistant Government Pleader waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondents. 2. By this Writ Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant has prayed for the following reliefs: “(A) This Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue writ of mandamus or a writ in nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction quashing and setting aside impugned N...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. Rule, returnable forthwith. Mr.Parth H. Bhatt, the learned standing counsel waives service of notice of Rule for and on behalf of the respondents. 2. By this writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ-applicant has prayed for the following reliefs : “8. A. Your Lordships may be pleased to admit and allow the present petition. B. Your Lordships may be pleased to Issue appropriate writ, order or direction upon the concerned respondent authorit...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

TIGER STEELS vs. ASSISTANT STATE TAX OFFICER


(Kerala High Court | Mar 11, 2020)

The grievance of the petitioner in the instant case is that while transporting the goods for the purpose of weighing was intercepted by the officials of the State Goods and Service Tax, for the reason that in Ext.P2 Delivery Chelan, instead of IGST inadvertently CGST and SGST was levied. It is in this circumstances, the jurisdiction of this Court has been invoked for issuing an appropriate direction to release the goods without collecting tax and penalty. 2. Having heard the counsel for t...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX vs. M/S. LE REVE PVT. LTD.


(National Anti Profiteering Authority | Mar 11, 2020)

ORDER 1. The Present Report dated 09.09.2019, received on  12.09.2019 by this Authority has been furnished by the Applicant No. 2 i.e. the Director-General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP). under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the present case are that a reference was received from the Standing Committee on Anti Profiteering on 27.03.2019 recommending a detailed investigation in respect of an application, originally examined by ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER The Writ Petition is filed in the nature of mandamus seeking a direction to open the online portal so as to enable the petitioner to again file the rectified Tran- I form or in the alternative to accept his application manually with necessary correction on or before 31.03.2020 to claim transitional credit. 2.The petitioner is a proprietorship company having its office and factory at Trichy, engaged in the manufacturing of boiler components to the BHEL and other major heavy engin...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SMT. JECINTHA PILLAI vs. THE STATE OF TELANGANA


(Telangana High Court | Mar 10, 2020)

ORDER : 1. The present Criminal Petition is filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C. seeking to enlarge the petitioners on bail, in the event of their arrest, in connection with the proceedings in F.No.INV/DGGI/ WRU/GST/04/2019-20/PF (Legal) on the file of the Special Judge for Economic Offences, Nampally, Hyderabad. 2. Heard Sri P.Vamseedhar Reddy, learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners and Sri B.Narasimha Sharma, learned Special Public Prosecutor, appearing for the respondent. 3. ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. KARNATAKA STATE ELECTRONICS DEVELOPMENT CORPO..


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Karnataka | Mar 10, 2020)

ORDER UNDER SECTION 98(4) OF THE CGST ACT, 2017 & UNDER 98(4) or THE KGST ACT, 2017 1. M/s. Karnataka State Electronics Development Corporation Limited, (called as the ‘Applicant’ hereinafter), 2nd Floor, TTMC A Block, BMTC Complex, K H Road, Shanthinagar, Bengaluru - 560 027, Karnataka., having GSTIN number 29AABCK6661P1ZT, have filed an application for Advance Ruling under Section 97 of CGST Act,2017 & KGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of CGST Rules 2017 & KGST R...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. VIKRAM TRADERS


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Karnataka | Mar 10, 2020)

ORDER UNDER SECTION 98(4) OF THE CGST ACT, 2017 & UNDER 98(4) or THE KGST ACT, 2017 1. M/s. Vikram Traders (called as the ‘Applicant’ hereinafter), Subramanyapura, Uttarahalli, Bengaluru-560 061, Karnataka, having GSTIN number 29AAAFV7242B1ZB, have filed an application for Advance Ruling under Section 97 of CGST Act, 2017 & KGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of CGST Rules 2017 & KGST Rules 2017, in form GST ARA-01 discharging the fee of ₹ 5,000/- each under the CG...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


19
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
20 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the m/o Apr 2025 (Monthly Taxpayer - Rule 61) - Either Compulsory taxpayer > 5 cr. or Voluntary taxpayer < 5 cr.

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5A

GSTR-5A for the m/o Apr 2025 [Return by OIDAR Service Providers - Rule 64.]

25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).