Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  13,223 Results

KOHITOOR TRANSPORT LLP vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Mar 4, 2020)

1. By this Writ Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant has prayed for the following reliefs: “(A) This Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ of certiorari or a writ in nature of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction quashing and setting aside detention order dated 17.09.2019 in Form GST MOV-6 (annexed at Annexure A) and confiscation notice dated 24.09.2019 in Form GST MOV-10 (annexed at Annexure B) (B) Thi...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

AT TRADING COMPANY vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Mar 4, 2020)

1. By this writ-application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ-applicant – a Proprietory concern, engaged in the business of Arecanut, has prayed for the following reliefs: 34(a) Be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, direction or order under Article 226 of the Constitution quashing and setting aside the detention order dated 25/26.04.2019 passed by respondent no.2 and notice dated 26.04.2019 read with revised notice dated 06.05.2019 issued by respondent no.2...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SHAKTI MOTORS vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Mar 4, 2020)

1. Rule returnable forthwith. Mr. Soaham Joshi, the learned AGP waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondents nos.1, 3, 4 and 5 respectively. The respondent no.2 i.e.The Goods and Services Tax Council although served with the notice issued by this Court, yet has chosen not to remain present before this Court either in person and through an advocate and oppose this writ-application. 2. By this writ-application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. By this Writ Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ-applicant has prayed for the following reliefs: “(A) This Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ of certiorari/mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, against the respondents by quashing the impugned notification no.8/2017-Integrated Tax (rate) dated 28.06.2017 and Entry 10 of the notification no.10/2017-Integrated Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 by declaring that same la...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

BHAWANI TEXTILES vs. ADDITIONAL DIRECTOR GENERAL


(Gujarat High Court | Mar 4, 2020)

1 By this writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant, a proprietary concern, through its proprietor, has prayed for the following reliefs: “(a) To issue writ of or in the nature of a mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction holding the proceedings initiated by respondent No.4 and respondent No.6 as bad and without authority of law and therefore quashed. (b) Pending admission, hearing and till final disposal of this petit...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petitioner a Private Limited Company engaged in manufacture and supply of fruit-based beverages/drinks registered under the Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 with GSTIN No.33AACCD9166HIZL. 2. According to the petitioner, the carbonated fruit drinks manufactured by them was classified under HSN 2202 9920 under GST and discharging GST @ 12% on all intra State and inter-State supplies. The codes have been specified under the Chapter XXII of GST Tariff Codes. In the aforemention...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

S. NARAYAN AND CO. vs. UNION OF INDIA


(Gujarat High Court | Mar 4, 2020)

1. Rule, returnable forthwith. Mr. Chintan Dave, the learned Assistant Government Pleader waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondent no.2. 2. By this Writ Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writapplicant, has prayed for the following reliefs: “7(A) To quash and set aside the order of Detention dated 31/08/2019 (Annexure - “A”) issued by the Respondent No.2; (B) To quash and set aside the Show Cause Notice dat...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

VALIMOHAMMED JUSAB AND CO. vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Mar 4, 2020)

1. Rule, returnable forthwith. Mr. Soaham Joshi, the learned Assistant Government Pleader waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondents. 2. By this Writ Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writapplicant, has prayed for the following reliefs: “17(A) Be pleased to issue a writ of certiorari or a writ in nature of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction quashing and setting aside the confiscation notice dated ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER 1. In these writ petitions, the issue involved is similar in nature and accordingly, the same are being taken up together. 2. The petitioners have approached this court with a prayer for allowing them to file/upload in GST TRAN-1. The petitioners intend to file TRAN-1 Form and/or revised TRAN-1 Form. 3. Though the time-limit for uploading of TRAN-1 is extended till March 31, 2020, sub-rule 1A of Rule 117 extends this benefit only to those registered persons who could not upl...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Petitioner is a Private Limited company registered under GST Act with GSTIN Number 23AAPC30963AIZL, which entered into a works contract agreement with M/S Offshore Infrastructure Limited, Mumbai to execute the work of Piping and Equipment Insulation works for offsite job for propellene Derivative Petrochemical Projects of M/s.Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, Kochi Refinery, Cochin. The aforementioned facts are evidenced from Ext.P1. 2. M/s. Offshore Infrastructure Limited is a regist...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


19
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
20 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the m/o Apr 2025 (Monthly Taxpayer - Rule 61) - Either Compulsory taxpayer > 5 cr. or Voluntary taxpayer < 5 cr.

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5A

GSTR-5A for the m/o Apr 2025 [Return by OIDAR Service Providers - Rule 64.]

25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).