Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  13,223 Results

ORDER 1. The present Report dated 06.09.2019, has been received from the Applicant No. 2 i.e. the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after a detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The facts of the case are that an application dated 05.02.2019 was filed before the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering under Rule 128 of the CGST Rules, 2017, by the Applicant No. 1, against the Respondent alleging profiteering by the R...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SHRI ABHISHEK SINGH vs. M/S. APARNA CONSTRUCTIONS AND ESTATES PVT. LTD.


(National Anti Profiteering Authority | Mar 4, 2020)

ORDER 1. The present Report dated 30.08.2019 has been received from the Applicant No. 2 i.e. the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the case are that vide his application dated 26.02.2018 filed before the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering under Rule 128 (1) of the CGST Rules, 2017, the Applicant No. 1 had alleged profiteering by the Respondent in re...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
[1] Present Review Application under Order XLVII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure has been filed by the applicants-respondent Nos. 2 & 3, seeking review of the final judgment and order dated 20.12.2019 (Annexure A-1) passed by this Court, whereby the writ petition bearing CWP No. 36658 of 2019 was allowed in terms of the CWP No. 30949 of 2018, decided on 04.11.2019, titled “Adfert Technologies Pvt. Ltd. Versus Union of India and othe...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Heard learned counsel appearing for the appellant. 2. We have permitted the learned counsel for the appellant to argue on the footing that the case is made out for condonation of delay. 3. Before the learned Single Judge, the challenge was two fold. Firstly, to the notice of demand dated 4th March 2019 (Annexure-J to the writ petition) by which a demand for interest in accordance with sub section (1) of Section 50 of Central Goods and Service Tax Act 2017 (for short 'GST Act')...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER Let the vakalatnama filed in Court today in terms of our order dated 27th February, 2020, be taken on record. The subject matter of challenge in the instant writ proceeding is an order dated 3rd June, 2019, passed by the Deputy Commissioner, Commercial Tax Office, Sector-21, Varanasi, under section 62 of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The writ petition has been filed on 24th February, 2020. Even if we are to assume that the writ petitioner has approa...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SUNIL CEMENT STORE vs. UNION OF INDIA AND 3 OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | Mar 3, 2020)

ORDER Proceedings under section 129(3) of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 have been taken out against the petitioner by the respondent No.4 / Assistant Commissioner, State Tax, Mobile Squad Unit, Ballia. The show cause notice dated 20th March, 2018 initiating the said proceedings requires the petitioner to deposit a bank guarantee equivalent to the amount stipulated therein. Sri Aloke Kumar, learned counsel on behalf of the petitioner undertakes that the petitio...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Challenges in these batch of appeals are against a common interim order passed by the Single Judge, dated 3rd February,2020. Relying on various earlier judgments passed by this court in identical situation, the learned Single Judge observed that, the respondent officers need to take steps to facilitate the writ petitioners for uploading 'FORM GST TRAN-1', in compliance with the directions contained in the earlier judgments. 2. But, learned counsel for the appellants submitted that...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
O R D E R C.M. No. 8549/2020 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 2445/2020 Issue notice. Learned counsels for respondents accept notice. Let notice be issued to respondent No.7 returnable on 30.07.2020. In the meantime, the served respondents may file their counter-affidavit(s) within six weeks. Rejoinder be filed before the next date of hearing. C.M. No. 8548/2020 Issue notice. Learned counsel for the resp...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M.M. SONS vs. UNION OF INDIA AND 3 OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | Mar 3, 2020)

ORDER Proceedings under section 129(3) of the Uttar Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 have been taken out against the petitioner by the respondent No.4 / Assistant Commissioner, State Tax, Mobile Squad Unit-IV, Varanasi. The show cause notice dated 8th March, 2018 initiating the said proceedings requires the petitioner to deposit a bank guarantee equivalent to the amount stipulated therein. Sri Aloke Kumar, learned counsel on behalf of the petitioner undertakes that the petitio...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SHRI S.C. GROVER vs. M/S. GARG KITCHEN COLLECTION


(National Anti Profiteering Authority | Mar 3, 2020)

ORDER 1. This Report, dated 04.09.2019, has been received by this Authority from the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods and Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the present case are that an application was received by the Standing Committee on Anti-Profiteering under Rule 128 of the CGST Rules, 2017 vide which the Applicant No. 1 had alleged profiteering in respect of the supply of ‘Sujata Mixer Grinder 900W’ (her...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


19
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
20 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the m/o Apr 2025 (Monthly Taxpayer - Rule 61) - Either Compulsory taxpayer > 5 cr. or Voluntary taxpayer < 5 cr.

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5A

GSTR-5A for the m/o Apr 2025 [Return by OIDAR Service Providers - Rule 64.]

25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).