Login | Register

GST Library

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Contact Us

Our Services

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,949 Results

Heard Sri Atul Kumar Shahi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri R.C. Shukla, learned counsel for the respondent department. Sri R.C. Shukla, learned counsel for the respondents has not been able to obtain instructions for a period of two months. His prayer for further one week time to obtain instructions is therefore turned down. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 06.09.2019 of provisional attachment of the property under Section 83 of the Central Goods and Services...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Heard Sri Ashwani Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Anant Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the respondent No. 1, 2 and 3 and Sri R.C. Shukla, learned counsel for the respondents No.4 and 5. The petitioner herein claims to be a registered firm under the GST having Registration No. 09AMEPK9117A1ZA. The petitioner claims that it is liable for Input Tax Credit (ITC) on the purchase of goods from the manufacturer. At the time of enactment of GST Act, 2017, the petitioner w...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SHYAM KHEMANI vs. STATE OF M.P. AND OTHERS


(Supreme Court | Aug 31, 2020)

ORDER The Court is convened through Video Conferencing. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners in Writ Petition (Crl.) No.221 of 2020 and Writ Petition (Crl.) No.223 of 2020. Applications seeking exemption from filing notarized affidavit and welfare stamp in both the matters are allowed. Issue notice. No coercive steps shall be taken against the petitioners by way of arrest in the meanwhile. However, this does not mean that investigation by the GST Aut...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
This appeal has been filed under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 by M/s Teamtrident Media LLP, Chand Bihari Nagar, 80, 2nd Floor, Om Tower, Near Khatipura Flyover, Khatipura, Jaipur-302012 (Rajasthan) (hereinafter also referred to as "the appellant") against the Order No.ZA9903200031730 Dated 16.03.2020 (hereinafter referred to as the "impugned order") passed by the Assistant Commissioner, Central Goods & Service Tax Division-B, Jaipur (herei...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

NARESH JAIN vs. SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL GOODS & SERVICE TAX DIVISI..


(First Appellate Authority, Jaipur | Aug 31, 2020)

This appeal has been filed under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 by Naresh Jain, 65, JDA Complex, Murlipura Scheme, Jaipur-302039 (Rajasthan) (hereinafter also referred to as "the appellant") against the Order No.ZA081119056322N Dated 20.11.2019 (hereinafter referred to as the "impugned order") passed by the Superintendent, Central Goods & Service Tax Division-C, Jaipur (hereinafter called as the "adjudication authority"). Brief...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. SRI. TAGHAR VASUDEVA AMBRISH


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Karnataka | Aug 31, 2020)

1. At the outset we would like to make it clear that the provisions of CGST, Act 2017 and SGST, Act 2017 are in pari materia and have the same provisions in like matter and differ from each other only on a few specific provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is particularly made to such dissimilar provisions, a reference to the CGST Act would also mean reference to the corresponding similar provisions in the KGST Act. 2. The present appeal has been filed under section 100 of the...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. The present Report dated 31.01.2020, has been received from the Applicant No. 3 i.e. the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after a detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the case are that an application was filed before the Karnataka State Screening Committee on Anti-profiteering by the Applicant No. 1, alleging profiteering by the Respondent in respect of purchase of Apartment No. Emerald-002, in t...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

DB IMPEX vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Aug 31, 2020)

1. The draft amendment is allowed. The same shall be carried out at the earliest. 2. With the consent of the learned counsel appearing for the parties, the matter is taken up for final hearing. Rule returnable forthwith. Shri Chintan Dave, learned Assistant Government Pleader waives service of notice of Rule for and on behalf of the respondents. 3. By this writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant a Proprietary Concern through its Proprietor h...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Heard Mr. R. Parthasarthy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Mohammed Shaffiq, learned Special Government Pleader for the respondents. 2. The challenge is to three orders of assessment, all dated 14.02.2020, passed in terms of the provisions of the Central Goods and Services Tax, 2017 (in short ‘Act’) for the periods 2017-18 to 2019-20. 3. The main ground agitated and argued before me is the violation of the principles of natural justice. Though no counters have b...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

GANPATI HERITAGE vs. THE DY/ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, CGST DIVISION-B, VK..


(First Appellate Authority, Jaipur | Aug 28, 2020)

This appeal has been filed under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 by M/s Ganpati Heritage, G-189-90 Badharna Industrial Area, Near Road No. 14, VKI Area, Jaipur (hereinafter also referred to as "the appellant") against the Order in Original No. JPR/Div-A/FinaI/434 dated 08.07.2019 (hereinafter referred to as "the impugned order") passed by the Deputy Commissioner, Central Goods & Service Tax Division-A, Jaipur (hereinafter also referred to as ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


29
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)