^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

URBANCLAP TECHNOLOGIES INDIA PVT LTD vs. STATE TAX OFFICER, CHENNAI AND OTHERS
(Madras High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

ANITA SUMANTH

Pet. Counsel

R.parthasarathy

Res. Counsel

Mohammed Shaffiq

Petitioner / Applicant	URBANCLAP TECHNOLOGIES INDIA PVT LTD
Respondent	STATE TAX OFFICER, CHENNAI AND OTHERS
Court	Madras High Court
State	Tamilnadu
Date	Aug 31, 2020
Order No.	W.P. Nos.9270 , 9275 & 9287 of 2020 and WMP. Nos.11303, 11334 & 11301 of 2020
Citation	2020(8) TAXREPLY 3290
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

AA |

ORDER
Heard Mr. R. Parthasarthy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Mohammed Shaffiq, learned Special Government Pleader for the respondents. 2. The challenge is to three orders of assessment, all dated 14.02.2020, passed in terms of the provisions of the Central Goods and Services Tax, 2017 (in short ‘Act’) for the periods 2017-18 to 2019-20. 3. The main ground agitated and argued before me is the violation of the principles of natural justice. Though no counters have been filed in the matter, Mr.Shaffiq, learned Special Government Pleader is armed with instructions and ready to proceed. He fairly states that effective opportunity, as urged, does not appear to have been extended to the petitioner insofar as personal hearing notice was issued on 13.02.2020 listing the matter for hearing on 14.02.2020, the very next day and the impugned orders have been passed on the same day. 4. In this context, I may refer to a decision of a learned Single Judge of this Co....