Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,949 Results

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER, CENTRAL TAX & CENTRAL EXCI.. vs. M/S INOX LEISURE LTD


(National Anti Profiteering Authority | Sep 8, 2020)

1. The present Report dated 31.01.2020 has been furnished by the Applicant No. 2 i.e. the Director-General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after a detailed investigation in line with Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the present case are that an application dated 22.05.2019 was filed by the Applicant No. 1 against the Respondent alleging profiteering in respect of supply of 'Services by way of admission to exhibition of cinematography f...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SHIVALIK SILICA


(First Appellate Authority, Jaipur | Sep 7, 2020)

This appeal has been filed under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 by M/s. Shivalik Silica, 427, Krishna Nagar, Bharatpur-321001 (hereinafter also referred to as “the appellant”) against the Order-in-Original No. 20/2019-20, dated 18-6-2019 (hereinafter as the impugned order) passed by the Assistant Commissioner, Central Goods and Services Tax Division-F, Bharatpur (hereinafter called as the “adjudicating authority”). 2. Brief facts o...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petitioner has approached this Court aggrieved by Ext.P2 series of assessment orders that have been passed under Section 62 of the GST Act. While various contentions have been raised in the writ petition, it is evident from the averments in the writ petition that the petitioner had received the assessment orders under Section 62 of the GST Act, on 04.10.2019, and the returns that had to be filed within 30 days after receipt of the order for getting the benefit of setting aside the orders ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Heard. 2. Aggrieved by the action of respondent nos.3 to 5 in issuing show cause notice and subsequently canceling the registration of the petitioner under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as 'the CGST Act') and thereafter refusing to revoke the cancellation of registration, the petitioner has preferred this writ petition. 3. The petitioner is a private limited company engaged in the business of trading in bath fittings and sanitary ware. I...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S BANGALORE MEDICAL SYSTEM


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Karnataka | Sep 7, 2020)

M/s. Bangalore Medical Systems, #5 866,1st Floor, S.M.Road, T.Dasarahalli, Bengaluru-560057 (hereinafter referred to “the applicant”) and having a GSTIN 29ADRPR1448K1ZS, have filed an application for Advance Ruling under Section 97 of the CGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of CGST Rules, 2017 and Section 97 of the KGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of KGST Rules 2017, in FORM GST ARA-01 discharging the fee of ₹ 5,000/- each under the CGST Act, KGST Act and IGST Act. 2. The app...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petitioner has approached this Court aggrieved by Ext.P11 order of detention, whereby a consignment of goods transported at his instance was detained by the 3rd respondent on the ground that there was no valid e-way bill covering the transportation of goods in terms of Section 138 of the GST Rules. 2. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as also the learned Government Pleader for the respondents. On a consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case and subm...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

ASHWANI AGARWAL vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | Sep 7, 2020)

Heard Sri Rahul Agarwal, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Ashok Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent nos. 2 and 3 and Sri M.K. Kushwaha, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent. The present writ petition has been filed with the prayer:- (i) issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari quashing the order dated 14.04.2020 (Annexure-5 to the writ petition) passed by the respondent no.3. Learned counsel for the respondent nos. 2...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. By this writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant, a proprietary concern, through its Proprietor has prayed for the following reliefs: “a. A writ of mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order and/or directions in the nature of mandamus to quash the order issued by the respondent no.2 for confiscation of perishable goods and levy of penalty under Section 130 of the GST Act; b. A writ of mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, orde...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
With the consent of both the parties, the Writ Petitions are taken up today and heard through video conferencing. 2. The petitioner herein had exported Knitwear and Knitted Fabric, which amounts to zero-rated supply and in terms of Section 16(3) of the IGST Act, 2017, had applied for refund of ITC under Section 54 of the CGST Act, 2017. The applications were made for the periods of July, August, September, October and November 2017. The petitioner's claim came to be rejected through f...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER After some time, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petition. Permission granted. The Special Leave Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


29
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)